The Most AI Porn Obsessed Locations in the U.S 2026

Hours Last Updated:

Share:

Onlyfans search engine Onlyguider has released new analysis that ranks every U.S State and over 160 cities by where is showing the highest search growth for AI Porn vs Onlyfans:

  • Atlanta, Georgia is the most AI-porn-obsessed major city in America — 2,345 searches per 10,000 residents in Q1 2026, up +68.7% year-over-year.
  • Wyoming is the most AI-porn-obsessed state — and the fastest-growing — at 402 per 10,000 (+165.2% YoY), the only state to top both leaderboards.
  • The fastest-growing major city is Newark, New Jersey, where AI porn searches went up +470% year-over-year in a single quarter.
  • Buffalo, New York is the only major city to appear in the top 10 of both leaderboards (#3 intensity, #2 growth).

Across all 50 states, AI porn search volume rose +76% YoY. Across the 164 cities we measured, every single one posted positive growth in Q1 2026 versus Q1 2025. There are no cool-off cities.

In the same quarter, OnlyFans visit-driven spend fell roughly 28% YoY in those same locations. The map of where AI porn is taking off is, with very few exceptions, the same map of where OnlyFans is being abandoned.

What people are actually trying to do with AI porn vs OnlyFans – and why it matters

The two ecosystems look superficially similar — adult search demand, growing categories, overlapping niches. They are not the same thing. When OnlyGuider classified every keyword in both U.S. datasets into intent buckets, the shape of what people actually want is fundamentally different.

What the searcher is trying to doOnlyFansAI Porn
Find a specific creator by name (Sophie Rain, Bhad Bhabie, etc.)64.2%~0%
Browse a desire or niche (“milf”, “asian”, “big tits”)33.5%45.4%
Make their own content (generators, undress apps, deepfake tools)0%19.2%
Watch ready-made content (videos, images)0%17.8%
Two-way chat / companion / game0%6.8%
Find a specific site or brand0.1%6.0%
Pricing / commercial2.2%4.7%

OnlyFans is a name-the-creator economy. Nearly two-thirds of all OnlyFans searches are for a specific person. The whole platform runs on parasocial attachment to named individuals.

AI porn is a self-serve workshop. There are no individuals to follow. Instead, audiences arrive with a desire (45.4% Browse), reach for tools to build it themselves (19.2% Create), or consume something already made (17.8%). Roughly 44% of AI porn demand never funnels to a human creator at any point — it’s served by tooling, not talent.

The single most striking number is the 19.2% Create bucket. Roughly 430,000 searches a month in the U.S. are for tools to generate synthetic adult content — generators, undress apps, deepfake software. That tier of behaviour didn’t meaningfully exist on the consumer internet two years ago, and it has no equivalent inside OnlyFans search at all.

Sam Pierce, CEO of OnlyGuider:

“This is the part of the story we’d rather not be telling. The data is bad for our business. But the demand-side picture we’re sitting on top of has implications for legislators, law enforcement and parents that are bigger than what happens to OnlyFans, and we’d rather be the people who said it out loud than the people who saw it and stayed quiet.”

The headline shift in Q1 2026 is a public-search shift — millions of Americans choosing to search for AI porn instead of OnlyFans content. That alone is a creator-economy story. What makes it a public-policy story is what those searches are actually for.

Top 10 cities — most AI-porn-obsessed (per 10,000 residents)

Major U.S. cities (population ≥ 250,000), ranked by Q1 2026 searches per 10,000 residents. OnlyFans YoY shown for context.

RankCityQ1 2026 (per 10k)Q1 2025 (per 10k)YoYOnlyFans YoY
1Atlanta, Georgia2,3451,389+68.7%-41.4%
2Seattle, Washington2,3201,234+88.1%-12.5%
3Buffalo, New York1,980374+427.8%-23.2%
4Denver, Colorado1,851798+131.7%-18.0%
5Minneapolis, Minnesota1,655755+119.3%-23.9%
6Miami, Florida1,496818+82.8%-37.6%
7St. Louis, Missouri1,283673+90.5%-38.0%
8Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania1,170512+128.8%-6.9%
9Orlando, Florida1,131627+80.0%-37.7%
10Dallas, Texas1,031500+106.2%-37.6%

Atlanta and Seattle are statistical neighbours at the top, and both are mature AI-porn markets — high baseline a year ago, still climbing. The interesting cluster is below them: Buffalo (+427.8%), Pittsburgh (+128.8%), Denver (+131.7%), Minneapolis (+119.3%), Dallas (+106.2%) all more than doubled in a single year and now sit in the top 10.

A pattern worth flagging — every city in this top 10 is also seeing OnlyFans spend decline. Atlanta (-41.4%), St. Louis (-38.0%), Miami (-37.6%), Orlando (-37.7%) and Dallas (-37.6%) post some of the largest local OnlyFans contractions in our dataset. The mildest exception is Pittsburgh (-6.9%), still in the red.

Top 10 cities — fastest-growing (YoY)

Major U.S. cities (population ≥ 250,000), ranked by year-over-year change in AI porn searches per 10,000 residents.

RankCityYoY GrowthQ1 2025 (per 10k)Q1 2026 (per 10k)OnlyFans YoY
1Newark, New Jersey+470.0%137776-7.9%
2Buffalo, New York+427.8%3741,980-23.2%
3Milwaukee, Wisconsin+217.7%166526-28.5%
4Tulsa, Oklahoma+210.7%115358-34.1%
5Nashville, Tennessee+194.4%150445-47.5%
6Raleigh, North Carolina+186.4%167480-22.8%
7Cleveland, Ohio+174.1%279768-28.8%
8Mesa, Arizona+166.7%138365-33.2%
9St. Petersburg, Florida+155.0%151383-38.0%
10Louisville, Kentucky+153.1%196494-28.5%

The growth list is geographically scrambled — Newark, Buffalo, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Louisville, Tulsa, Nashville, Raleigh, Mesa, St. Petersburg. Northeast, Rust Belt, South, Sun Belt — there is no single regional story.

The standout overlap is Buffalo, NY (#3 intensity, #2 growth) — already above the national average a year ago and now nearly the most intensive AI-porn market in the country. Nashville, TN is also worth flagging for an extreme combination: AI porn up +194.4% while OnlyFans spend collapsed -47.5%, the steepest local OnlyFans decline among major cities in our growth top 10.

Top 10 states — most AI-porn-obsessed (per 10,000 residents)

Ranked by Q1 2026 searches per 10,000 residents.

RankStateQ1 2026 (per 10k)Q1 2025 (per 10k)YoYOnlyFans YoY
1Washington457309+48.1%-28.8%
2Kansas441281+56.9%-29.0%
3Colorado428253+68.8%-28.6%
4Wyoming402151+165.2%-28.4%
5Oregon392268+46.3%-28.2%
6New Hampshire335192+74.3%-28.5%
7Arizona333187+78.3%-23.9%
8Alaska330204+61.5%-28.4%
9Missouri320203+58.1%-28.5%
10Illinois315190+65.1%-28.5%

The state intensity list is a Western and Mountain-state sweep. Washington, Colorado, Oregon, Wyoming, Arizona, Alaska, New Hampshire — seven of the top 10 are West or Northern-Plains states. Kansas and Missouri break the pattern from the Midwest; Illinois is the only major industrial-state entry.

Every single state in this top 10 is seeing OnlyFans spend down between -23% and -29% YoY — a remarkably tight band given how different these markets look on every other dimension.

Top 10 states — fastest-growing (YoY)

Ranked by year-over-year change in AI porn searches per 10,000 residents.

RankStateYoY GrowthQ1 2025 (per 10k)Q1 2026 (per 10k)OnlyFans YoY
1Wyoming+165.2%151402-28.4%
2Rhode Island+105.9%119244-18.2%
3Nevada+104.8%147301-33.8%
4California+92.4%162312-23.7%
5South Dakota+92.2%134257-37.7%
6New York+90.7%147280-23.8%
7Maine+81.0%144261-23.8%
8South Carolina+80.0%124222-37.5%
9Arizona+78.3%187333-23.9%
10New Jersey+77.0%118208-28.5%

Wyoming is the only state to appear in the top 10 of both leaderboards — already the most intensive AI-porn market and still the fastest-growing. Rhode Island, Nevada, California, South Dakota, New York and New Jersey round out a list with no obvious geographic pattern. AI porn growth is not a coastal story or a red-state story — it’s an everywhere story.

What it means for OnlyFans

Across the 164 cities and 50 states OnlyGuider tracks, the relationship between AI-porn growth and OnlyFans-spend decline is strikingly tight. Cities with the highest AI porn intensity are, on average, cities with the largest OnlyFans contractions. The shape of the substitution differs by market — in some places it’s pure displacement, in others it’s a wider drift toward off-platform behaviour — but the direction is uniform.

This is a Q1 2026 snapshot. We have not been tracking AI porn search behaviour quarter by quarter before this; the OnlyFans Wrapped 2025 report compared full-year 2025 to full-year 2024 globally. This is the first quarterly cut. The Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 spread is what surprised us, and it’s why we went looking for the cities and states leading the shift.

The bigger picture is in our Q1 2026 National Report and The Great OnlyFans Cool-Off. 

Sam Pierce, Onlyguider CEO: “the U.S. is not seeing an AI porn surge in a few specific places. It is seeing one almost everywhere — and most loudly in the cities and states that already led the previous wave”

Appendix A — Full city ranking by AI porn intensity (Q1 2026, per 10,000)

All 164 cities in the OnlyGuider Q1 2026 city panel, ranked by Q1 2026 AI porn searches per 10,000 residents. OnlyFans YoY shown where available. Includes cities below the 250k headline threshold.

RankCityQ1 2026 (per 10k)Q1 2025 (per 10k)YoYOnlyFans YoY
1Atlanta, Georgia2,3451,389+68.7%-41.4%
2Seattle, Washington2,3201,234+88.1%-12.5%
3Buffalo, New York1,980374+427.8%-23.2%
4Denver, Colorado1,851798+131.7%-18.0%
5Birmingham, Alabama1,675501+235.3%-18.1%
6Minneapolis, Minnesota1,655755+119.3%-23.9%
7Salt Lake City, Utah1,6071,046+53.7%-38.0%
8Miami, Florida1,496818+82.8%-37.6%
9St. Louis, Missouri1,283673+90.5%-38.0%
10Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania1,170512+128.8%-6.9%
11Orlando, Florida1,131627+80.0%-37.7%
12Dallas, Texas1,031500+106.2%-37.6%
13Portland, Oregon1,002558+79.8%-28.5%
14Kansas City, Missouri944376+150.5%-23.9%
15Cincinnati, Ohio937401+134.4%-41.5%
16Los Angeles, California913376+143.0%-18.2%
17Las Vegas, Nevada901399+125.7%-32.8%
18San Jose, California873388+124.6%-23.5%
19Chicago, Illinois828376+120.2%-19.4%
20Knoxville, Tennessee785439+78.6%-53.1%
21Newark, New Jersey776137+470.0%-7.9%
22Cleveland, Ohio768279+174.1%-28.8%
23Columbia, South Carolina722231+212.5%-38.4%
24Boston, Massachusetts699343+103.3%-37.7%
25Rochester, New York689347+97.4%-18.4%
26Tampa, Florida662533+24.5%-33.1%
27Manchester, New Hampshire652165+290.0%-23.8%
28Spokane, Washington642489+31.0%-34.0%
29Columbus, Ohio629380+65.7%-34.0%
30Phoenix, Arizona610293+107.9%-37.6%
31Green Bay, Wisconsin596442+33.3%-28.7%
32Saint Paul, Minnesota584520+11.9%-23.8%
33Detroit, Michigan574249+131.7%-38.0%
34Oklahoma City, Oklahoma568295+92.3%-23.9%
35Charlotte, North Carolina564292+93.2%-38.0%
36Indianapolis, Indiana560232+141.0%-18.2%
37Washington, District of Columbia551303+81.8%-33.1%
38Providence, Rhode Island531142+271.4%-28.5%
39Richmond, Virginia530309+72.2%-28.7%
40Akron, Ohio529141+271.4%-41.5%
41Milwaukee, Wisconsin526166+217.7%-28.5%
42Tacoma, Washington511333+52.6%-33.3%
43Boise, Idaho509492+3.3%-34.0%
44Louisville, Kentucky494196+153.1%-28.5%
45Charleston, South Carolina4800—-29.4%
46Honolulu, Hawaii480220+117.5%-18.1%
47Raleigh, North Carolina480167+186.4%-22.8%
48Springfield, Missouri477182+162.5%-33.1%
49Grand Rapids, Michigan468679-31.4%-18.4%
50Billings, Montana461145+211.1%-33.3%
51Des Moines, Iowa452327+38.1%-33.1%
52Nashville, Tennessee445150+194.4%-47.5%
53Colorado Springs, Colorado444231+91.4%-28.4%
54Vancouver, Washington431389+10.5%-34.0%
55Tucson, Arizona425288+48.1%-28.4%
56Omaha, Nebraska424228+86.0%-28.7%
57Austin, Texas419241+73.8%-32.9%
58Anchorage, Alaska418292+43.2%-18.2%
59Edison, New Jersey398287+37.5%-37.3%
60Jersey City, New Jersey397198+100.0%+0.0%
61Fort Collins, Colorado393310+25.9%-33.3%
62Overland Park, Kansas392152+160.0%-28.5%
63Albuquerque, New Mexico387221+75.0%-33.1%
64St. Petersburg, Florida383151+155.0%-38.0%
65Reno, Nevada380243+56.2%-24.8%
66Sioux Falls, South Dakota376216+77.3%-41.7%
67Columbia, Missouri374406-7.7%-18.3%
68Syracuse, New York372186+100.0%-23.5%
69Nampa, Idaho366272+33.3%-58.9%
70Mesa, Arizona365138+166.7%-33.2%
71Evansville, Indiana363160+120.0%-37.7%
72Lansing, Michigan359306+16.7%-33.3%
73Tulsa, Oklahoma358115+210.7%-34.1%
74Lafayette, Louisiana356257+40.0%+4.4%
75Montgomery, Alabama349145+140.0%-29.1%
76New Haven, Connecticut34360+500.0%-18.3%
77Scottsdale, Arizona341180+87.5%+4.9%
78Eugene, Oregon338306+10.0%-28.7%
79Kansas City, Kansas332147+125.0%-33.2%
80Houston, Texas331179+85.0%-23.7%
81Little Rock, Arkansas326133+142.9%-33.1%
82San Antonio, Texas325147+120.3%-28.5%
83Hartford, Connecticut322157+100.0%-23.8%
84Philadelphia, Pennsylvania320178+79.7%-32.7%
85San Francisco, California319216+47.5%-24.2%
86Baton Rouge, Louisiana318227+38.5%-34.0%
87Bellevue, Washington316295+9.1%-20.5%
88Winston-Salem, North Carolina308172+81.8%-18.3%
89Clarksville, Tennessee308253+23.8%-40.1%
90Huntsville, Alabama307191+61.9%-18.4%
91Durham, North Carolina307123+150.0%-18.2%
92Meridian, Idaho304252+20.0%-7.3%
93Chandler, Arizona299121+150.0%-18.2%
94Aurora, Colorado299171+75.8%-24.0%
95Chattanooga, Tennessee298160+86.7%-51.0%
96Savannah, Georgia292156+83.3%-48.0%
97Jackson, Mississippi291129+120.0%-34.1%
98Warren, Michigan29160+400.0%-29.9%
99Madison, Wisconsin285185+53.9%-23.8%
100Salem, Oregon285234+23.8%-24.2%
101South Bend, Indiana281116+150.0%-33.3%
102Allentown, Pennsylvania28096+200.0%-24.1%
103Memphis, Tennessee275171+60.7%-50.8%
104Fresno, California274153+78.6%-18.1%
105New York City, New York268123+119.0%-23.9%
106Henderson, Nevada266128+109.5%-23.9%
107Jacksonville, Florida257155+65.8%-34.0%
108Broken Arrow, Oklahoma257133+87.5%-38.7%
109Norman, Oklahoma25398+166.7%-33.3%
110Fort Wayne, Indiana250117+112.5%-45.4%
111Wichita, Kansas249161+54.5%-11.3%
112Worcester, Massachusetts249157+60.0%-28.7%
113Mobile, Alabama246144+71.4%-28.5%
114Fayetteville, Arkansas245160+50.0%-42.0%
115Gresham, Oregon245172+40.0%-33.3%
116Fort Worth, Texas244144+70.6%-33.1%
117Rochester, Minnesota244262-6.7%-29.9%
118Norfolk, Virginia244113+114.3%-45.3%
119Topeka, Kansas242148+60.0%-29.3%
120Waterbury, Connecticut23670+250.0%-51.7%
121Bridgeport, Connecticut235155+50.0%-52.5%
122San Diego, California231158+45.3%-37.5%
123Carmel, Indiana230120+100.0%+14.8%
124Cambridge, Massachusetts228296-22.2%-33.3%
125New Orleans, Louisiana227190+18.4%-37.1%
126Baltimore, Maryland222157+41.7%-33.1%
127Sterling Heights, Michigan221267-16.7%-18.3%
128Rockford, Illinois20786+150.0%-41.9%
129Lowell, Massachusetts207108+100.0%-23.9%
130Naperville, Illinois206153+33.3%-29.3%
131Las Cruces, New Mexico205107+100.0%-19.5%
132Lincoln, Nebraska200141+42.9%-28.5%
133Independence, Missouri198198+0.0%-33.3%
134Erie, Pennsylvania195175+11.1%-37.9%
135Tuscaloosa, Alabama191171+11.1%-34.9%
136Orem, Utah188133+50.0%-24.5%
137Virginia Beach, Virginia178110+61.5%-49.1%
138Chesapeake, Virginia169128+31.2%-33.1%
139Cedar Rapids, Iowa169198-14.3%-28.6%
140Provo, Utah165148+11.1%-38.6%
141Columbia, Maryland163115+50.0%-8.3%
142Toledo, Ohio15163+133.3%-28.5%
143Fargo, North Dakota151525-70.6%-45.4%
144Greensboro, North Carolina144144+0.0%-41.5%
145Aurora, Illinois13991+50.0%-33.3%
146Sandy, Utah138111+33.3%-22.6%
147West Valley City, Utah136108+25.0%-29.0%
148Columbus, Georgia135115+16.7%-38.2%
149Lawton, Oklahoma132132+0.0%-38.2%
150Olathe, Kansas12592+33.3%+6.0%
151Kenosha, Wisconsin12181+50.0%-33.3%
152North Charleston, South Carolina114114+0.0%-28.9%
153North Las Vegas, Nevada11162+75.0%-22.9%
154Springfield, Massachusetts11178+50.0%-19.5%
155Newport News, Virginia106161-33.3%-28.4%
156Joliet, Illinois102183-42.9%-33.3%
157Paterson, New Jersey9450+100.0%-29.4%
158Shreveport, Louisiana9143+125.0%-41.9%
159Stamford, Connecticut8989+0.0%-38.4%
160Rio Rancho, New Mexico8888+0.0%-45.5%
161Yonkers, New York7540+100.0%-23.9%
162Woodbridge, New Jersey4060-33.3%-13.4%
163Lakewood, Colorado2626+0.0%-33.1%
164Sandy Springs, Georgia00—-18.4%

Appendix B — Full city ranking by AI porn YoY growth

Same 164 cities, ranked by year-over-year change in AI porn searches per 10,000 residents.

RankCityYoY GrowthQ1 2025 (per 10k)Q1 2026 (per 10k)OnlyFans YoY
1New Haven, Connecticut+500.0%60343-18.3%
2Newark, New Jersey+470.0%137776-7.9%
3Buffalo, New York+427.8%3741,980-23.2%
4Warren, Michigan+400.0%60291-29.9%
5Manchester, New Hampshire+290.0%165652-23.8%
6Providence, Rhode Island+271.4%142531-28.5%
7Akron, Ohio+271.4%141529-41.5%
8Waterbury, Connecticut+250.0%70236-51.7%
9Birmingham, Alabama+235.3%5011,675-18.1%
10Milwaukee, Wisconsin+217.7%166526-28.5%
11Columbia, South Carolina+212.5%231722-38.4%
12Billings, Montana+211.1%145461-33.3%
13Tulsa, Oklahoma+210.7%115358-34.1%
14Allentown, Pennsylvania+200.0%96280-24.1%
15Nashville, Tennessee+194.4%150445-47.5%
16Raleigh, North Carolina+186.4%167480-22.8%
17Cleveland, Ohio+174.1%279768-28.8%
18Mesa, Arizona+166.7%138365-33.2%
19Norman, Oklahoma+166.7%98253-33.3%
20Springfield, Missouri+162.5%182477-33.1%
21Overland Park, Kansas+160.0%152392-28.5%
22St. Petersburg, Florida+155.0%151383-38.0%
23Louisville, Kentucky+153.1%196494-28.5%
24Kansas City, Missouri+150.5%376944-23.9%
25Durham, North Carolina+150.0%123307-18.2%
26Chandler, Arizona+150.0%121299-18.2%
27South Bend, Indiana+150.0%116281-33.3%
28Rockford, Illinois+150.0%86207-41.9%
29Los Angeles, California+143.0%376913-18.2%
30Little Rock, Arkansas+142.9%133326-33.1%
31Indianapolis, Indiana+141.0%232560-18.2%
32Montgomery, Alabama+140.0%145349-29.1%
33Cincinnati, Ohio+134.4%401937-41.5%
34Toledo, Ohio+133.3%63151-28.5%
35Detroit, Michigan+131.7%249574-38.0%
36Denver, Colorado+131.7%7981,851-18.0%
37Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania+128.8%5121,170-6.9%
38Las Vegas, Nevada+125.7%399901-32.8%
39Kansas City, Kansas+125.0%147332-33.2%
40Shreveport, Louisiana+125.0%4391-41.9%
41San Jose, California+124.6%388873-23.5%
42San Antonio, Texas+120.3%147325-28.5%
43Chicago, Illinois+120.2%376828-19.4%
44Evansville, Indiana+120.0%160363-37.7%
45Jackson, Mississippi+120.0%129291-34.1%
46Minneapolis, Minnesota+119.3%7551,655-23.9%
47New York City, New York+119.0%123268-23.9%
48Honolulu, Hawaii+117.5%220480-18.1%
49Norfolk, Virginia+114.3%113244-45.3%
50Fort Wayne, Indiana+112.5%117250-45.4%
51Henderson, Nevada+109.5%128266-23.9%
52Phoenix, Arizona+107.9%293610-37.6%
53Dallas, Texas+106.2%5001,031-37.6%
54Boston, Massachusetts+103.3%343699-37.7%
55Jersey City, New Jersey+100.0%198397+0.0%
56Syracuse, New York+100.0%186372-23.5%
57Hartford, Connecticut+100.0%157322-23.8%
58Carmel, Indiana+100.0%120230+14.8%
59Lowell, Massachusetts+100.0%108207-23.9%
60Las Cruces, New Mexico+100.0%107205-19.5%
61Paterson, New Jersey+100.0%5094-29.4%
62Yonkers, New York+100.0%4075-23.9%
63Rochester, New York+97.4%347689-18.4%
64Charlotte, North Carolina+93.2%292564-38.0%
65Oklahoma City, Oklahoma+92.3%295568-23.9%
66Colorado Springs, Colorado+91.4%231444-28.4%
67St. Louis, Missouri+90.5%6731,283-38.0%
68Seattle, Washington+88.1%1,2342,320-12.5%
69Scottsdale, Arizona+87.5%180341+4.9%
70Broken Arrow, Oklahoma+87.5%133257-38.7%
71Chattanooga, Tennessee+86.7%160298-51.0%
72Omaha, Nebraska+86.0%228424-28.7%
73Houston, Texas+85.0%179331-23.7%
74Savannah, Georgia+83.3%156292-48.0%
75Miami, Florida+82.8%8181,496-37.6%
76Washington, District of Columbia+81.8%303551-33.1%
77Winston-Salem, North Carolina+81.8%172308-18.3%
78Orlando, Florida+80.0%6271,131-37.7%
79Portland, Oregon+79.8%5581,002-28.5%
80Philadelphia, Pennsylvania+79.7%178320-32.7%
81Knoxville, Tennessee+78.6%439785-53.1%
82Fresno, California+78.6%153274-18.1%
83Sioux Falls, South Dakota+77.3%216376-41.7%
84Aurora, Colorado+75.8%171299-24.0%
85Albuquerque, New Mexico+75.0%221387-33.1%
86North Las Vegas, Nevada+75.0%62111-22.9%
87Austin, Texas+73.8%241419-32.9%
88Richmond, Virginia+72.2%309530-28.7%
89Mobile, Alabama+71.4%144246-28.5%
90Fort Worth, Texas+70.6%144244-33.1%
91Atlanta, Georgia+68.7%1,3892,345-41.4%
92Jacksonville, Florida+65.8%155257-34.0%
93Columbus, Ohio+65.7%380629-34.0%
94Huntsville, Alabama+61.9%191307-18.4%
95Virginia Beach, Virginia+61.5%110178-49.1%
96Memphis, Tennessee+60.7%171275-50.8%
97Worcester, Massachusetts+60.0%157249-28.7%
98Topeka, Kansas+60.0%148242-29.3%
99Reno, Nevada+56.2%243380-24.8%
100Wichita, Kansas+54.5%161249-11.3%
101Madison, Wisconsin+53.9%185285-23.8%
102Salt Lake City, Utah+53.7%1,0461,607-38.0%
103Tacoma, Washington+52.6%333511-33.3%
104Fayetteville, Arkansas+50.0%160245-42.0%
105Bridgeport, Connecticut+50.0%155235-52.5%
106Orem, Utah+50.0%133188-24.5%
107Columbia, Maryland+50.0%115163-8.3%
108Aurora, Illinois+50.0%91139-33.3%
109Kenosha, Wisconsin+50.0%81121-33.3%
110Springfield, Massachusetts+50.0%78111-19.5%
111Tucson, Arizona+48.1%288425-28.4%
112San Francisco, California+47.5%216319-24.2%
113San Diego, California+45.3%158231-37.5%
114Anchorage, Alaska+43.2%292418-18.2%
115Lincoln, Nebraska+42.9%141200-28.5%
116Baltimore, Maryland+41.7%157222-33.1%
117Lafayette, Louisiana+40.0%257356+4.4%
118Gresham, Oregon+40.0%172245-33.3%
119Baton Rouge, Louisiana+38.5%227318-34.0%
120Des Moines, Iowa+38.1%327452-33.1%
121Edison, New Jersey+37.5%287398-37.3%
122Green Bay, Wisconsin+33.3%442596-28.7%
123Nampa, Idaho+33.3%272366-58.9%
124Naperville, Illinois+33.3%153206-29.3%
125Sandy, Utah+33.3%111138-22.6%
126Olathe, Kansas+33.3%92125+6.0%
127Chesapeake, Virginia+31.2%128169-33.1%
128Spokane, Washington+31.0%489642-34.0%
129Fort Collins, Colorado+25.9%310393-33.3%
130West Valley City, Utah+25.0%108136-29.0%
131Tampa, Florida+24.5%533662-33.1%
132Clarksville, Tennessee+23.8%253308-40.1%
133Salem, Oregon+23.8%234285-24.2%
134Meridian, Idaho+20.0%252304-7.3%
135New Orleans, Louisiana+18.4%190227-37.1%
136Lansing, Michigan+16.7%306359-33.3%
137Columbus, Georgia+16.7%115135-38.2%
138Saint Paul, Minnesota+11.9%520584-23.8%
139Erie, Pennsylvania+11.1%175195-37.9%
140Tuscaloosa, Alabama+11.1%171191-34.9%
141Provo, Utah+11.1%148165-38.6%
142Vancouver, Washington+10.5%389431-34.0%
143Eugene, Oregon+10.0%306338-28.7%
144Bellevue, Washington+9.1%295316-20.5%
145Boise, Idaho+3.3%492509-34.0%
146Independence, Missouri+0.0%198198-33.3%
147Greensboro, North Carolina+0.0%144144-41.5%
148Lawton, Oklahoma+0.0%132132-38.2%
149North Charleston, South Carolina+0.0%114114-28.9%
150Stamford, Connecticut+0.0%8989-38.4%
151Rio Rancho, New Mexico+0.0%8888-45.5%
152Lakewood, Colorado+0.0%2626-33.1%
153Rochester, Minnesota-6.7%262244-29.9%
154Columbia, Missouri-7.7%406374-18.3%
155Cedar Rapids, Iowa-14.3%198169-28.6%
156Sterling Heights, Michigan-16.7%267221-18.3%
157Cambridge, Massachusetts-22.2%296228-33.3%
158Grand Rapids, Michigan-31.4%679468-18.4%
159Newport News, Virginia-33.3%161106-28.4%
160Woodbridge, New Jersey-33.3%6040-13.4%
161Joliet, Illinois-42.9%183102-33.3%
162Fargo, North Dakota-70.6%525151-45.4%

Appendix C — Full state ranking by AI porn intensity (Q1 2026, per 10,000)

All 50 states, ranked by Q1 2026 AI porn searches per 10,000 residents.

RankStateQ1 2026 (per 10k)Q1 2025 (per 10k)YoYOnlyFans YoY
1Washington457309+48.1%-28.8%
2Kansas441281+56.9%-29.0%
3Colorado428253+68.8%-28.6%
4Wyoming402151+165.2%-28.4%
5Oregon392268+46.3%-28.2%
6New Hampshire335192+74.3%-28.5%
7Arizona333187+78.3%-23.9%
8Alaska330204+61.5%-28.4%
9Missouri320203+58.1%-28.5%
10Illinois315190+65.1%-28.5%
11California312162+92.4%-23.7%
12Nevada301147+104.8%-33.8%
13Vermont295233+26.9%-33.0%
14Minnesota288188+52.8%-24.0%
15Utah285197+44.5%-33.1%
16New York280147+90.7%-23.8%
17Oklahoma273164+66.1%-33.1%
18Michigan272168+62.3%-28.5%
19Idaho269228+17.8%-37.7%
20Ohio267154+73.8%-28.5%
21Maine261144+81.0%-23.8%
22South Dakota257134+92.2%-37.7%
23Virginia257162+58.4%-28.5%
24Georgia252163+54.8%-38.0%
25Tennessee250150+66.2%-50.6%
26Massachusetts246141+74.2%-23.9%
27Indiana246145+69.7%-23.9%
28Rhode Island244119+105.9%-18.2%
29Wisconsin236152+55.1%-24.0%
30Montana230158+45.2%-28.5%
31North Carolina226133+70.5%-28.5%
32South Carolina222124+80.0%-37.5%
33Delaware221136+62.2%-13.0%
34Alabama219136+60.4%-23.7%
35Pennsylvania219149+46.6%-23.9%
36Hawaii216123+76.1%-28.8%
37North Dakota211195+8.8%-41.5%
38Texas209126+66.3%-29.2%
39Nebraska208133+56.5%-33.0%
40New Jersey208118+77.0%-28.5%
41Florida208141+47.6%-33.7%
42West Virginia207120+72.7%-33.1%
43Connecticut206144+43.1%-23.7%
44Kentucky201158+26.6%-33.0%
45New Mexico192132+45.2%-28.2%
46Iowa185132+39.6%-37.9%
47Arkansas174144+20.9%-28.4%
48Louisiana171113+51.5%-28.3%
49Maryland166115+44.4%-28.5%
50Mississippi126105+20.8%-28.5%

Appendix D — Full state ranking by AI porn YoY growth

All 50 states, ranked by year-over-year change.

RankStateYoY GrowthQ1 2025 (per 10k)Q1 2026 (per 10k)OnlyFans YoY
1Wyoming+165.2%151402-28.4%
2Rhode Island+105.9%119244-18.2%
3Nevada+104.8%147301-33.8%
4California+92.4%162312-23.7%
5South Dakota+92.2%134257-37.7%
6New York+90.7%147280-23.8%
7Maine+81.0%144261-23.8%
8South Carolina+80.0%124222-37.5%
9Arizona+78.3%187333-23.9%
10New Jersey+77.0%118208-28.5%
11Hawaii+76.1%123216-28.8%
12New Hampshire+74.3%192335-28.5%
13Massachusetts+74.2%141246-23.9%
14Ohio+73.8%154267-28.5%
15West Virginia+72.7%120207-33.1%
16North Carolina+70.5%133226-28.5%
17Indiana+69.7%145246-23.9%
18Colorado+68.8%253428-28.6%
19Texas+66.3%126209-29.2%
20Tennessee+66.2%150250-50.6%
21Oklahoma+66.1%164273-33.1%
22Illinois+65.1%190315-28.5%
23Michigan+62.3%168272-28.5%
24Delaware+62.2%136221-13.0%
25Alaska+61.5%204330-28.4%
26Alabama+60.4%136219-23.7%
27Virginia+58.4%162257-28.5%
28Missouri+58.1%203320-28.5%
29Kansas+56.9%281441-29.0%
30Nebraska+56.5%133208-33.0%
31Wisconsin+55.1%152236-24.0%
32Georgia+54.8%163252-38.0%
33Minnesota+52.8%188288-24.0%
34Louisiana+51.5%113171-28.3%
35Washington+48.1%309457-28.8%
36Florida+47.6%141208-33.7%
37Pennsylvania+46.6%149219-23.9%
38Oregon+46.3%268392-28.2%
39New Mexico+45.2%132192-28.2%
40Montana+45.2%158230-28.5%
41Utah+44.5%197285-33.1%
42Maryland+44.4%115166-28.5%
43Connecticut+43.1%144206-23.7%
44Iowa+39.6%132185-37.9%
45Vermont+26.9%233295-33.0%
46Kentucky+26.6%158201-33.0%
47Arkansas+20.9%144174-28.4%
48Mississippi+20.8%105126-28.5%
49Idaho+17.8%228269-37.7%
50North Dakota+8.8%195211-41.5%

Methodology

  • AI porn search volume: monthly Bing Ads keyword volumes for AI-porn-related terms, aggregated to U.S. cities and U.S. states. Q1 2025 vs Q1 2026..
  • City coverage: the underlying panel covers 164 U.S. cities; headline top-10 city tables are restricted to cities with 2024 population ≥ 250,000 for consistency with prior OnlyGuider reporting and to avoid small-baseline noise. Full all-cities rankings are in the appendices.
  • Per-10,000 normalisation: extrapolated quarterly searches divided by 2024 Census population estimates ÷ 10,000.
  • OnlyFans YoY (city/state): OnlyFans visit-driven spend, Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025, derived from on-platform traffic and modelled spend. See OnlyGuider’s Q1 2026 National Report appendices for full methodology.
  • Intent classification: every keyword in both the U.S. AI porn keyword set (2.2M monthly searches) and the U.S. OnlyFans keyword set (30.4M monthly searches, piracy/leaks stripped) was classified into one of seven intent buckets. Share-of-volume reported here.
  • Caveats: AI porn is a young category and search behaviour shifts faster than search-engine keyword data updates. We treat single-quarter percentage changes as directional, not precise. Cities and states with very low Q1 2025 baselines can post extreme percentage gains off small absolute numbers — see the per-10k columns to weight that.

Copyright & Attribution

Most AI Porn Obsessed in U.S Analysis © 2026 by Onlyguider is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Author

  • Sam Pierce

    Founder & CEO, OnlyGuider

    Built OnlyGuider from a spreadsheet to the leading search in the category — 1M+ monthly active users on a 24-hour-fresh index that’s become the default way people find OnlyFans creators. Quoted by NY Post, Vice, Yahoo News, FOX 4, CBS, Boston 25, and the Toronto Sun on how the creator economy actually works.

    Why he built it

    Sam was hunting for the right business to build. One chart kept climbing faster than anything else online — OnlyFans. He signed up as a user to understand the demand.

    He hit a wall in the first hour. The biggest creator economy on the internet had no real search, no activity filters, no way to tell who was still posting. Curated lists went stale in a week. The platform had no front door.

    He started building one. Not a directory — a crawler that checked real activity 24/7 and scored every profile automatically. Three pillars: last seen, user behavior, profile freshness. Re-scored every 24 hours. No manual lists, no bought rankings, no opinions.

    That became AlgoRank. That became OnlyGuider. Now it’s the way people search the platform.

    “The platform had millions of creators and basically no way to find the good ones. That was the whole product thesis.”

    — Sam Pierce, Founder & CEO, OnlyGuider

    What he’s published

    OnlyFans Statistics — The Definitive Reference

    The reference dataset on OnlyFans. Index size, activity rates, creator demographics, spending patterns, growth curves — every number anyone needs to talk about the platform, kept current and continuously updated.

    Read the report →

    OnlyFans Wrapped 2025 — Global Spending Analysis

    $7.2B in global creator-economy revenue. Per-capita spend across 100+ markets, emerging geographies, year-over-year trends. The most-cited creator-economy report of 2025 — picked up by NY Post, Yahoo, FOX 4, CBS, Boston 25, and the Toronto Sun.

    Read the report →

    The 2026 U.S. OnlyFans Creator Census

    $1.68 billion in income generated by American creators on the platform. Demographics, geography, earnings distribution — the most complete public profile of the U.S. creator base ever published.

    Read the report →

    U.S. OnlyFans Spending by State & City — 2025

    All 50 states. 167 American cities. Per-capita spend, year-over-year growth, market-by-market breakdowns. The dataset behind the NY Post, FOX 4, CBS, and Boston 25 stories.

    Read the report →

    The World’s Most Searched OnlyFans Categories

    What people actually search for on OnlyFans, ranked. The largest behavioral dataset on platform demand published — niches, body types, demographics, regions — drawn from the millions of monthly searches running through OnlyGuider.

    Read the report →

    In the news

    Outlet Quote
    AOL “History shows that moments of political change are often accompanied by bursts of online expression, escapism, and digital spending.”
    The Independent “What older generations might sneer at as scandal, students are increasingly viewing as strategy.”
    Yahoo Lifestyle “We expected the usual urban hotspots — Dallas, Austin, Houston — to lead this year’s spending charts.”
    Evening Standard “What older generations might sneer at as scandal, students are increasingly viewing as strategy.”
    WDBO “Orlando has always been a cultural trendsetter — from theme parks to entertainment to lifestyle.”
    Boston 25 News “Across Massachusetts, residents spent $56.6 million on OnlyFans in 2025 — about $155,068 per day statewide.”
    Toronto Sun “Let’s be honest — Canadians are horny and they’re not shy about it.”
    FOX 4 News “The Fort Worth and Dallas split is the single most striking data point in the Texas numbers.”

    Press inquiries: [email protected] · Replies within 24 hours

Want more paying OnlyFans subscribers?

Launch a campaign in 24 hours and fill your creators’ pages with real fans, not freebie hunters.

Recent partner average: $4.24 back per $1 spent • 324% ROMI

Start My 24h Campaign

Real people only. No bots, no spam traffic sources.

ONLY FOR ONLYFANS AGENCIES, MODELS, AND MARKETERS

Want to promote your OnlyFans profile?

Start getting paying subscribers from search. Launch in 48 hours.

Recent partner average: $4.24 back per $1 • 324% ROMI

Start Promoting — Go Live in 48h

Traffic quality guaranteed.