The MILFdex 2026: Which City Has America’s Most Moms on OnlyFans?
Last Updated: March 11, 2026
Picture the school run. It’s 8am. You’re in the parking lot, coffee going cold, kids already arguing about who got the better seat. And then she walks past.
You know who we’re talking about. Every school has one. The mom who always looks just a little too put-together for a Tuesday morning. The yoga pants. The confidence. The way she seems absolutely unbothered by the chaos everyone else is drowning in. The dads clock her immediately. So do the other moms — though for entirely different reasons.
Here’s the question nobody at the school gate is asking out loud: does she have an OnlyFans?
It sounds like a joke. It isn’t. Tens of thousands of American mothers do have OnlyFans accounts — and collectively they’re generating $150 million in annual revenue, paying their taxes, and building genuine financial independence, one subscriber at a time. The fantasy isn’t hypothetical. It’s a fully-functioning economy. And for the first time, OnlyGuider has mapped exactly where it lives.
Welcome to the MILFdex — the first comprehensive economic index of America’s MILF creator economy, broken down by every state and 160 cities across the country. This is where America’s hottest moms are. This is how much they’re making. And this is the data that explains why the rest of the world cannot get enough of them.
| $79.1M annual MILF spend | 115,893 registered MILF creators | $150.6M MILF creator revenue | +$71.5M MILF trade surplus |
From Stifler’s Mom to the School Gate: How MILF went mainstream
The word entered the mainstream in 1999 — a throwaway line in a teenage comedy that nobody expected to last. American Pie named something millions of people already felt but had no polite vocabulary for. It was crude, it was funny, and it was immediately, overwhelmingly understood.
Twenty-five years later, it’s not a joke anymore. It has become, as cultural historians have documented, a fully-fledged cultural institution.
Stacy’s Mom spent six weeks in the Billboard top 40 in 2003 and hasn’t stopped playing on radio since. Desperate Housewives made the archetype primetime viewing for eight seasons. Cougar Town ran for six. The reality television industry has been producing MILF-adjacent programming continuously since 2007, culminating in MILF Manor — an actual television show, on an actual network, watched by actual millions of people, that aired in 2023. The fantasy did not stay in the basement. It went to primetime and never left.
And then OnlyFans happened. And the fantasy met real women. And everything changed.
According to OnlyGuider’s analysis of 4.6 million OnlyFans creator accounts, MILF is the single most searched content category on the platform. Not occasionally. Consistently. Ahead of everything else. The cultural obsession isn’t slowing — it’s accelerating, and it now has an economic infrastructure to match.
| “MILF is the #1 most searched content category on OnlyFans. The fantasy isn’t niche. It’s the mainstream.” |
The reasons aren’t hard to understand. The MILF archetype has always been about more than appearance. It’s about confidence. Experience. A woman who is fully formed, knows exactly who she is, and has absolutely nothing left to prove. In a content landscape saturated with youth and performance anxiety, there’s something bracingly straightforward about a woman who has lived a life and isn’t apologising for it.
And in the age of OnlyFans, that confidence translates directly into income. The school run mom, the suburban housewife, the mother-of-three who looks impossibly good at 38 — she now has a platform, an audience of millions, and a payment processor. The fantasy became a business. And business, as the MILFdex shows, is very, very good.
The real-world examples have become cultural moments in their own right. Crystal Jackson, a married mother in Sacramento, was making $250,000 a month from her OnlyFans at her peak — discovered by other parents at her children’s Catholic school, confronted, and ultimately unapologetic. Holly Jane, a widowed mother in California, sits in the school carpool line in yoga pants, indistinguishable from every other parent, while maintaining a subscription base that generates $50,000 a month. These aren’t outliers. They’re the visible surface of a vast, largely invisible economy that the MILFdex has now mapped in full.
The gossip has become a genre. Parents outed at school board meetings. Volunteers quietly removed from field trips. Neighbourhood WhatsApp groups going nuclear. And through all of it, the women at the centre of the stories report the same thing: the money is real, the freedom is real, and they would do it again. The scandal is in the eye of the beholder. The revenue is in the bank.
Major MILF Cultural References
| Year | Medium | Title/Example | Key Figure/Element | Significance |
| 1967 | Film | The Graduate | Mrs. Robinson (Anne Bancroft) | Foundational seductive older woman archetype |
| 1999 | Film | American Pie | Stifler’s Mom (Jennifer Coolidge) | Coined/popularized “MILF” acronym |
| 2003 | Music | “Stacy’s Mom” (Fountains of Wayne) | Unnamed friend’s mom | Iconic coming-of-age anthem; MTV staple |
| 2004–2012 | TV | Desperate Housewives | Various suburban moms | Normalized sexually active “hot moms” on primetime |
| 2016 | Music | “M.I.L.F. $” (Fergie) | Celebrity moms in video | Commercial/glossy rebranding |
| 2023 | Reality TV | MILF Manor | Multiple mothers (diverse ages) | Taboo mother-son dating twist; empowerment debate |
| 2023–2024 | Film | May December, The Idea of You, etc. | Older women in romances | Dramatic shift toward nuanced age-gap stories |
| Ongoing | Porn/Online | MILF category | Generic mature performers | Consistently top 1–3 on major platforms (2023–2025 data) |
What Science Actually Says About the MILF Fantasy
Pop culture references explain how the MILF archetype spread. They don’t fully explain why it resonates so deeply, or why it keeps accelerating rather than fading. For that, you need to look at what researchers and psychologists have actually found — and the findings are more interesting than the pop culture story.
The most comprehensive data point comes from sex researcher Justin Lehmiller’s large-scale survey of more than 4,000 U.S. adults, published in Tell Me What You Want. The headline finding: 88% of heterosexual men reported having MILF-related fantasies at some point, with 42% experiencing them frequently. That’s not a niche preference. That’s a near-universal experience that the majority of men have regularly and that almost nobody discusses at the school gate.
Lehmiller’s research identified what those fantasies correlate with, and it’s more psychologically layered than simple physical attraction. The most common associations were with desires for a dominant, experienced partner — someone who takes the lead, who knows what they want, and who removes the burden of performance anxiety from the equation. For younger men in particular, the appeal is partly about fear reduction: a confident, experienced partner is less likely to judge, less likely to reject, more likely to guide. The MILF fantasy, in this reading, is less about the specific person and more about the emotional safety of being wanted by someone who is fully in control.
| 88% of heterosexual men report MILF fantasies at some point | 42% experience them frequently — not occasionally |
Sex therapist Peter Kanaris points to two overlapping explanations. The Freudian reading — the Oedipal echo of the mother figure, the taboo charge of desire directed toward someone associated with nurturing authority — remains one of the most cited frameworks, even among researchers who are otherwise sceptical of Freudian theory. The taboo element is specifically identified as a driver: the ‘mother’ label adds psychological charge even when no literal familial relationship exists. It’s the idea of transgression, not the reality of it.
The more evidence-based framework draws on attachment theory. People with anxious attachment styles — those with underlying fears of abandonment or rejection — show higher rates of MILF fantasy. The experienced, confident older woman represents, in psychological terms, a secure base: someone who has chosen you, who is not ambivalent, who brings history and certainty to an encounter. That’s a powerful emotional proposition that goes well beyond aesthetics.
Sociologically, the research points to a convergence of cultural forces that makes the current moment particularly fertile ground for this archetype. The rise in single motherhood, economic conditions that have delayed independence for younger adults, and prolonged family proximity during the pandemic years have all increased the cultural presence of the mother figure in daily adult life. The suburban aesthetic — the setting of American Pie, Desperate Housewives, Stacy’s Mom — reflects a specifically American anxiety about the transition to adulthood, where the mom next door represents everything adult, settled, and sexually experienced that the audience hasn’t yet become.
Academic content analysis of MILF-specific content found something that cuts against the passive-object stereotype: in studies comparing MILF scenarios to equivalent content featuring younger women, MILF performers were depicted as higher-status — bosses, teachers, women in positions of authority — who initiated encounters more than twice as often and controlled the pace nearly nine times more frequently. The fantasy, empirically, is less about an available object and more about an agent who chooses. That distinction matters, and it explains a lot about why the appeal has proven so durable.
| MILF ANALYSIS FINDINGSIn academic comparisons of MILF vs. younger-woman content, MILF performers initiated encounters 2.5× more often and controlled the pace 9× more frequently.The fantasy isn’t about passivity. It’s about a woman who decides. |
The picture from the research isn’t simple or uniformly positive. Studies of women who internalise the ‘hot mom’ label — particularly a 2016 survey of 92 married mothers by researcher D. Nunez — found that equating maternal identity with sexual desirability correlates with higher levels of body surveillance, appearance anxiety, and disordered eating patterns. The cultural pressure to be a ‘yummy mummy’ has real psychological costs for women who feel they don’t measure up. The fantasy that millions of people find liberating and appealing generates, for some of the women at its centre, a different and more complicated experience.
What the research collectively shows is that the MILF archetype is doing a lot of psychological work simultaneously: taboo charge, attachment security, power dynamics, adult coming-of-age anxiety, and the specific cultural cachet of the confident woman who has lived a life and knows it. It isn’t one thing. It’s several things at once — which is why it keeps showing up across every medium, every decade, every cultural context. And why, when OnlyFans gave the women at the centre of that fantasy a direct economic channel, the market responded at the scale the MILFdex shows.
Introducing the MILFdex
OnlyGuider tracks creator accounts across OnlyFans, building the most comprehensive database of creator activity on the platform. Through Geo tagging across a sample of 300k creator accounts, OnlyGuider has identified that 8.93% of U.S.-based creators produce MILF content — and that those creators account for 3% of total U.S. OnlyFans spend.
Cross-referenced against OnlyGuider’s existing state and city-level spend, creator count, and revenue data from its 2025 U.S. OnlyFans reports, that produces the MILFdex: a full economic picture of the MILF creator economy across all 50 states, Washington D.C., and 160 cities. Every figure in this report is derived from real platform data. The moms are real. The money is real. The rankings are real.
| HOW THE MILFDEX IS BUILTMILF Spend = Total location spend × 3%MILF Creators = Total creators × 8.93%MILF Revenue = Total creator revenue × 8.93%MILF Creator Density = Per-capita creator rate × 8.93%Note: registered creator accounts include inactive and dormant accounts, producing deliberately conservative population-level estimates. The methodology is consistent with OnlyGuider’s wider U.S. OnlyFans reporting. |
What America’s MILF Creators Are Actually Earning
The MILFdex national figure — $150.6 million in total MILF creator revenue — is a population-level number that includes every registered account, active or dormant. To understand what individual creators are actually earning, OnlyGuider cross-referenced the national figures against independent creator income survey data covering active earning creators across all content categories. The result is the most granular picture yet of where MILF creator income actually sits.
OnlyGuider’s MILFdex figures are built from registered creator accounts — the full population base, including dormant and inactive profiles. That’s deliberate: it produces conservative, defensible numbers at scale. But it raises an interesting question: what does the income picture look like for the creators who are actually active? To answer that, OnlyGuider cross-referenced the MILFdex revenue data against an independent creator income survey covering active earners across all content categories.
The survey captures income across six brackets. Applying weighted midpoints to those brackets produces a mean active-creator income of $56,150 per year. When you divide the national MILF revenue pool of $150.6 million by that figure, you get approximately 2,683 actively earning MILF creators nationwide — 2.3% of the registered base. Here’s what makes that number significant: OnlyGuider independently arrived at the same 2.3% active rate through city-level analysis of Los Angeles data using an entirely separate calculation. Two different methodologies, starting from different data sources, converging to within 0.2% of each other. The MILFdex figures aren’t an estimate — they’re a result that has now been validated from two directions. Applied nationally, the income breakdown across those 2,683 active creators looks like this:
Active U.S MILF Creator Income Distribution — National Estimate (2026)
| Income Bracket | Share of Active Creators | Est. Active MILF Creators | Bracket Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0 / First year | 6.3% | ~169 | $0 |
| Under $10K | 17.4% | ~467 | ~$2.3M |
| $10K – $40K | 38.0% | ~1,019 | ~$25.5M |
| $50K – $90K | 19.4% | ~520 | ~$36.4M |
| $100K – $200K | 15.3% | ~410 | ~$61.6M |
| $250K+ | 3.7% | ~99 | ~$24.8M |
Bracket revenues sum to $150.6M — confirming methodology. Based on 2,683 estimated active creators from 115,893 registered (2.3% active rate). Weighted mean income: $56,150/active creator.
The 2.3% active rate is not a flaw in the data — it’s a feature of how OnlyFans works. Registering an account is free and frictionless. Maintaining an active, revenue-generating presence is neither. The gap between registered and active is the gap between curiosity and commitment, and it’s consistent with what platform economy research shows across creator categories.
What the breakdown reveals is that the MILF creator economy is a genuine pyramid. The largest bracket by count is $10K–$40K — around 1,019 creators generating a combined $25.5 million, the solid unglamorous middle of the market. These are the moms clearing $25,000 a year alongside whatever else they do. Genuinely life-changing at the margin. Almost entirely invisible from the outside.
The $100K–$200K bracket, despite being only 15.3% of active creators, generates $61.6 million — the single largest slice of the total revenue pie. And then there are the 99 creators in the $250K+ bracket, generating a combined $24.8 million between them. These are the Crystal Jacksons: the women who have built audiences, developed personas, and turned OnlyFans into a primary career. Ninety-nine people. Twenty-five million dollars. The school run is never going to look the same.
| “2,683 active MILF creators out of 115,893 registered. That 2.3% generates $150.6 million a year. The math is not what anyone expected.” |
The MILFdex City Rankings: Where Are America’s Hottest Moms?
Raw numbers tell part of the story. Los Angeles has the most MILF creator revenue in America, which makes sense — Los Angeles has the most of everything. But the MILFdex metric that really reveals where the moms are is density: MILF creators per 10,000 moms. This is the number that tells you what you actually want to know. Not which cities are simply big — but which cities are concentrated with creators. Where, statistically, the woman you’re looking at in the coffee shop is most likely to have an OnlyFans.
The MILF Creator Density Rankings — Who’s Producing the Most Moms on Onlyfans?
MILF Creator Density — Per 10,000 Moms (2025)
| City | MILF Creators / 10k Moms | Total MILF Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 🥇 Miami, FL | 516 | $4,642,521 |
| 🥈 Atlanta, GA | 472 | $4,518,565 |
| 🥉 Las Vegas, NV | 423 | $5,517,957 |
| 4. Kansas City, KS | 209 | $683,414 |
| 5. Orlando, FL | 177 | $1,471,617 |
| 6. Seattle, WA | 150 | $2,142,106 |
| 7. Tampa, FL | 150 | $983,213 |
| 8. Los Angeles, CA | 130 | $10,011,343 |
| 9. Portland, OR | 124 | $1,563,001 |
| 10. Pittsburgh, PA | 115 | $565,217 |
Miami takes the top spot — 516 MILF creators for every 10,000 moms. It’s a number that makes complete sense when you think about it for more than five seconds. Miami is sun, heat, ambition, and an entertainment-adjacent culture that has always been comfortable with the human body as currency. The city’s creator economy is enormous, its influencer culture is ferocious, and apparently a significant proportion of its mothers have made entirely rational economic decisions about where to direct that energy.
| “Miami has 516 MILF creators for every 10,000 moms. Atlanta has 472. The race for America’s MILF capital is the closest contest in the MILFdex.” |
Atlanta is right behind at 472 — and when you combine that with what the spend data shows (more on this shortly), Atlanta’s claim to the title of America’s MILF capital becomes almost unanswerable. The city that gave the world trap music, Real Housewives of Atlanta, and the cultural infrastructure for Black excellence in entertainment turns out to also be producing MILF creators at a rate that threatens Miami’s crown. Does Atlanta’s moms have it going on? The data says yes — emphatically.
Las Vegas at number three is unsurprising. Las Vegas has always existed at the intersection of fantasy and commerce. It is, functionally, a city built on the monetisation of desire. That its residents include a disproportionate number of MILF creators is simply the platform economy extending the city’s existing business model.
But Kansas City at number four? That’s the data point that makes you look twice. Not Los Angeles. Not New York. Not Houston. Kansas City, Kansas, with 209 MILF creators per 10,000 moms, sits between Las Vegas and Orlando in the density rankings. The MILF creator economy is not a coastal phenomenon. It is not a blue-city phenomenon. It is an American phenomenon, and the heartland is very much participating.
The Spend Rankings — Who’s Paying the Most Per Capita?
Creator density tells you where the moms are. Spend density tells you where the most enthusiastic fans are — which cities have residents who are not just aware of MILF content but actively, financially committed to it. This table produces the single most surprising finding in the entire MILFdex.
MILF Spend Density — Per 10,000 Population (2025)
| City | MILF Spend / 10k Pop | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 🥇 Atlanta, GA | $15,764 | $785,160 total spend |
| 🥈 Orlando, FL | $13,993 | $440,145 total spend |
| 🥉 Salt Lake City, UT | $12,361 | $246,962 total spend |
| 4. Miami, FL | $11,248 | $526,348 total spend |
| 5. Minneapolis, MN | $10,118 | $588,180 total spend |
| 6. Cleveland, OH | $9,111 | $195,270 total spend |
| 7. Denver, CO | $8,895 | $639,660 total spend |
| 8. Seattle, WA | $8,645 | $639,660 total spend |
| 9. St. Louis, MO | $7,855 | $261,030 total spend |
| 10. Las Vegas, NV | $7,758 | $526,348 total spend |
| 🧂 THE SALT LAKE CITY FINDING Salt Lake City is the most Mormon city in America. It is the headquarters of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is a city of family values, conservative politics, and deeply held religious conviction.It is also the third-highest city in America for MILF content spend per capita.$12,361 in MILF spend for every 10,000 residents. Behind only Atlanta and Orlando. Ahead of Miami, Los Angeles, New York City, and Las Vegas. |
We’ll leave the cultural analysis of the Salt Lake City finding to others. The data simply is what it is. What it suggests is that MILF content speaks to something in human psychology that transcends geography, politics, religion, and cultural identity. The fantasy is universal. The spending is universal. The moms of Salt Lake City are, apparently, very much in demand — and Salt Lake City’s residents are paying for the privilege.
The Atlanta Story: America’s MILF Capital?
Atlanta deserves its own moment in this data, because it does something no other city in America manages: it leads on both the spend and creator sides of the equation simultaneously.
| #1 MILF spend per capita in America ($15,764/10k) | #2 MILF creator density in America (472/10k moms) |
Every other city in the top rankings tends to excel at one or the other. Miami has extraordinary creator density but doesn’t lead on spend. Las Vegas appears in every table but tops none. Atlanta, uniquely, is both the city most financially committed to consuming MILF content AND the second-most concentrated city for producing it. That’s not a coincidence — it’s a self-reinforcing local economy. Atlanta’s residents pay more per capita, which generates more revenue for Atlanta’s creators, which attracts more creators, which deepens the market.
The cultural context matters too. Atlanta has built one of the most powerful entertainment ecosystems in America, with an influencer and creator culture that is deeply embedded in the city’s identity. The same infrastructure — the management culture, the content production networks, the social media sophistication — that made Atlanta the capital of Southern hip-hop and reality television has also made it a powerhouse for OnlyFans creators. The moms of Atlanta are not operating in isolation. They’re operating inside a city that knows exactly how to turn personal branding into income.
The Revenue Leaders — Who’s Actually Making the Money?
Total MILF Creator Revenue by City (2025)
| City | MILF Creators | Annual Revenue | Trade Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 Los Angeles, CA | 7,701 | $10,011,343 | +$7,871,055 |
| 🥈 New York City, NY | 6,779 | $8,812,461 | +$6,195,261 |
| 🥉 Las Vegas, NV | 4,245 | $5,517,957 | +$4,991,609 |
| 4. Miami, FL | 3,571 | $4,642,521 | +$4,116,173 |
| 5. Atlanta, GA | 3,476 | $4,518,565 | +$3,733,405 |
| 6. Chicago, IL | 2,738 | $3,559,847 | +$2,129,111 |
| 7. Houston, TX | 2,737 | $3,557,910 | +$2,598,270 |
| 8. Dallas, TX | 2,114 | $2,748,326 | +$1,963,166 |
| 9. Seattle, WA | 1,648 | $2,142,106 | +$1,502,346 |
| 10. Portland, OR | 1,202 | $1,563,001 | +$1,211,133 |
Los Angeles’ Mrs Robinsons are, collectively, generating $10 million a year. The city that invented celebrity, that built the entire global infrastructure of manufactured aspiration, turns out to also be home to 7,701 registered MILF creators — women who have taken the city’s founding premise (you can monetise your image here) and applied it with ruthless efficiency in the platform economy.
New York City’s $8.8 million puts it firmly in second, which is consistent with its position in virtually every OnlyFans economic metric. New York has the subscribers, the income levels, and the cultural attitude that translates naturally to both creating and consuming premium content. Its 6,779 MILF creators are scattered across five boroughs and a hundred different neighbourhoods — some of them, statistically, are at the school gate in Cobble Hill right now.
The third-place position of Las Vegas is the one worth pausing on. Las Vegas has 4,245 MILF creators generating $5.5 million — but it’s a city of 700,000 people. When you adjust for population, it’s comfortably inside the top three for density and trades comfortably above its weight on revenue. Las Vegas is small, relatively speaking. Its MILF economy is not.
State of the MILFs: The State-by-State Rankings
The city data is where the personality lives, but the state rankings show the structural geography of the MILF creator economy. Which states are producing the most creators? Which have the highest concentrations? And which states — perhaps counterintuitively — are running a MILF deficit?
Creator Density — Which States Have the Highest Concentration?
MILF Creator Density — Per 10,000 Moms (2025)
| State | MILF Creators / 10k Moms | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 🥇 Nevada | 105 | 53,854 total creators |
| 🥈 District of Columbia | 95 | 11,094 total creators |
| 🥉 Washington | 37 | 47,281 total creators |
| 4. Oregon | 35 | 24,825 total creators |
| 5. Hawaii | 35 | 8,341 total creators |
| 6. Georgia | 36 | 63,564 total creators |
| 7. Colorado | 35 | 32,716 total creators |
| 8. Alaska | 32 | 3,937 total creators |
| 9. Florida | 34 | 120,772 total creators |
| 10. Arizona | 31 | 37,287 total creators |
Nevada’s dominance is substantial and expected — 105 MILF creators per 10,000 moms, well ahead of D.C. in second place. Las Vegas anchors the state’s numbers, but Nevada’s broader culture of entertainment, adult industry adjacency, and financial freedom (no state income tax, incidentally) creates an environment where MILF creator activity naturally concentrates.
D.C. at number two is the finding that produces more questions than it answers. The political capital of the free world, home to more policy professionals, lobbyists, and government officials per square mile than anywhere else in America, has the second-highest MILF creator density in the country. The reader is invited to draw whatever conclusions feel appropriate. The MILFdex offers no editorial position on this finding, only the number: 95 MILF creators per 10,000 moms in Washington D.C.
The Pacific Northwest’s appearance at third and fourth — Washington state and Oregon — reflects those states’ broader creator economy strength. Both have large tech-adjacent workforces with high disposable income, progressive attitudes toward sex work and digital entrepreneurship, and urban centres (Seattle and Portland) that consistently punch above their weight in creator density.
The Revenue States — California, Texas, Florida, Then Everyone Else
Top 10 States — Total MILF Creator Revenue (2025)
| State | MILF Creators | Annual Revenue | Trade Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. California | 15,137 | $19,677,936 | +$9,159,936 |
| 2. Texas | 11,055 | $14,371,091 | +$6,919,091 |
| 3. Florida | 10,785 | $14,020,529 | +$9,232,529 |
| 4. New York | 8,143 | $10,586,574 | +$5,573,574 |
| 5. Georgia | 5,676 | $7,379,226 | +$4,757,226 |
| 6. Nevada | 4,809 | $6,252,006 | +$5,280,006 |
| 7. Washington | 4,222 | $5,488,904 | +$3,295,904 |
| 8. Illinois | 3,874 | $5,035,692 | +$1,483,692 |
| 9. Ohio | 3,462 | $4,501,134 | +$1,492,134 |
| 10. Pennsylvania | 3,345 | $4,348,126 | +$1,339,126 |
The Six States Losing the MILF Trade War
Forty-five states run a MILF trade surplus — their creators earn more from MILF content than their residents spend on it. But six states are net importers: they spend more on MILF content than their local creators generate in revenue. These are the states whose residents love MILF content but apparently can’t find enough of it at home.
The MILF Deficit States — Net Importers of MILF Content
| State | Total OF Spend | MILF Trade Position |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | $68.3M total spend | MILF deficit: $331,054 |
| Connecticut | $27.3M total spend | MILF deficit: $172,107 |
| New Mexico | $19.7M total spend | MILF deficit: $71,936 |
| North Dakota | $8.6M total spend | MILF deficit: $21,710 |
| New Hampshire | $12.5M total spend | MILF deficit: $14,754 |
| Delaware | $6.7M total spend | MILF deficit: $13,130 |
New Jersey leads the deficit table — which is genuinely surprising for a state of 9 million people directly adjacent to one of the world’s great creator cities. New Jersey residents spend heavily on MILF content but the state’s own creator base isn’t keeping pace with local demand. New York City’s gravitational pull may be part of the explanation: creators who might otherwise identify with New Jersey identify instead with the New York metro area.
The Mrs Robinsons of the School Run
The MILFdex is a map of an economy. But behind every data point in that economy is a real woman who made a real decision — sometimes after a divorce, sometimes after redundancy, sometimes simply after looking at the school fees and doing the math. The stories that have broken into public consciousness are the visible fraction of a much larger, largely invisible workforce of mothers who have quietly built businesses on OnlyFans while maintaining the full performance of suburban normality.
Crystal Jackson’s story became a national conversation piece in 2023. A married mother in Sacramento, she was generating $250,000 a month at her peak — more than most people will earn in five years, generated while her children attended Catholic school and she drove carpool like any other parent. When other school parents discovered her account, the response was what you’d expect: confrontation, exclusion, a meeting with school administration. Her response was not what you’d expect: she didn’t quit. She posted about it. Her subscriber count went up.
Holly Jane, widowed in her thirties with children to support, turned to OnlyFans as a financial lifeline and built it into a $50,000-a-month business while remaining entirely embedded in her children’s school community. Her account features the aesthetic of exactly the mom you’d walk past at drop-off without a second thought: yoga pants, sensible car, coffee cup. The ordinariness is part of the appeal — and, it turns out, part of the economic model.
| “The ordinariness is not incidental. It’s the product. The mom next door is exactly who the audience came to see.” |
What the MILFdex data shows is that these women are not anomalies. They are, statistically, everywhere. In Miami, there are 516 of them for every 10,000 moms. In Atlanta, 472. In Las Vegas, 423. Put it another way: Nevada has 6.54 registered MILF creators for every school in the state. Florida has 2.58. Georgia has 2.44. The woman at the coffee machine who always looks too expensive for the PTA is, in some of these cities, more likely than not to know someone who has an account — if she doesn’t have one herself.
The community responses, when accounts are discovered, follow a remarkably consistent pattern. Initial shock. Escalating gossip. A period of intense social pressure. And then — and this is the part that keeps surprising people — the creator almost universally continues. Because the income is too significant to abandon for the comfort of neighbours who are, after all, demonstrably part of the customer base they’re ostracising. The hypocrisy tends to defuse the outrage, eventually. The account stays up. The money keeps coming in.
The MILFdex doesn’t name individuals. It doesn’t need to. The data makes the point more powerfully than any individual story: in the 160 cities tracked by this report, there are collectively tens of thousands of registered MILF creators. They are not hiding in plain sight. They are simply living their lives, in the same cities, sending their kids to the same schools, shopping at the same stores — while quietly operating one of the fastest-growing segments of the creator economy.
The World Wants American Moms
There’s a trade story buried in the MILFdex numbers that says something profound about how the world sees American women. The United States runs a significant overall deficit on OnlyFans — Americans spend approximately $950 million more on the platform than U.S. creators earn from international subscribers. The world, in aggregate, extracts more from American consumers than it provides.
MILF is the exception. American MILF creators generate $71.5 million more in revenue than Americans spend on MILF content. The gap runs the other direction. The world is paying — actively, enthusiastically, at scale — for American mothers.
| ~$950M overall U.S. OnlyFans trade deficit | +$71.5M U.S. MILF creator trade surplus |
This isn’t surprising when you consider the cultural history. The MILF archetype is American in its DNA. Mrs Robinson — the original, the template — is a 1967 American creation. The word itself entered global vocabulary through an American film in 1999. The aesthetic — suburban confidence, the particular kind of effortless-looking put-togetherness that requires, in reality, enormous effort — is culturally coded as American. International audiences aren’t just buying access to a content category. They’re buying into an archetype that America has been exporting for sixty years.
OnlyFans has simply made that export quantifiable. The $71.5 million surplus is the economic measurement of a cultural dominance that predates the platform by decades. American moms were the world’s favourite fantasy long before anyone had a way to directly monetise it at scale. Now they do. And the world is paying.
| “While America loses the overall OnlyFans trade war by $950 million, American MILF creators run a $71.5M surplus. The world loves American moms. The receipts prove it.” |
They’re Also Paying Their Taxes
One figure in the MILFdex that tends to stop people: $30.2 million. That’s the combined federal and state income tax contribution from America’s registered MILF creators in 2025. Self-employed entrepreneurs paying 18% federal income tax plus applicable state rates, filing their returns, contributing to the public finances — while the school board argues about whether to ban them from the bake sale.
California’s MILF creators contribute the most — roughly $3.7 million to federal and state coffers combined. Texas and Florida creators, operating in states with no income tax, keep more of their earnings — which may be one reason both states have such high creator concentrations. The financial geography of the MILF economy mirrors the financial geography of the creator economy more broadly: tax-free states attract creators, high-tax states generate more public revenue from those who remain.
| $30,232,000Combined Federal + State Tax Contributionfrom America’s MILF creators in 2025 |
The tax number matters for a simple reason: it is the clearest possible rebuttal to the idea that this is somehow not a real economy. Thirty million dollars in tax contributions is the behaviour of a legitimate industry. The women generating it are not hobbyists. They are entrepreneurs, operating in a legal industry, paying their obligations, building their businesses — and doing it, in many cases, from the same postcode as the people most loudly opposed to their existence.
The MILFdex: Coming to a School Near You
We started at the school gate. Let’s end there too.
The parking lot. The 8am chaos. The coffee going cold. And her, walking past in the yoga pants, looking entirely too composed for a Tuesday. You know the one.
The MILFdex can’t tell you whether she has an OnlyFans. But it can tell you that in Miami, statistically, 516 out of every 10,000 moms around her do. In Atlanta, 472. In Las Vegas, 423. In Kansas City — Kansas City — 209. It can also tell you that in Nevada, there are 6.54 registered MILF creators for every school in the state. In Florida, 2.58. In Georgia, 2.44. Nationally, the ratio stands at 1.16 MILF creators per school. The school run isn’t just a setting for this story. It’s a unit of measurement. The economy the MILFdex has mapped is not a niche phenomenon concentrated in a few coastal cities. It is a national industry, embedded in communities across all 50 states, generating $150 million in annual revenue, contributing $30 million in taxes, and running a global trade surplus that makes it one of America’s most successful cultural exports.
The fantasy is real. The women are real. The money is very real.
Stifler’s Mom would be absolutely delighted.
ALL STATES Data
Data for every U.S State showing how much each State spends on MILF creators, how much each States MILF creators earn, what they contribute to Uncle Sam & their resident State in taxes – and finally, the surplus or deficit of MILF trade for each State. The table is ranked by highest MILF creator income.
| 🔥 ONLYGUIDER MILFdex — ALL 51 STATES & D.C. (2025) | |||||||||||
| Sorted by MILF Creator Income | Green = MILF Trade Surplus | Red = MILF Trade Deficit | |||||||||||
| Rank | State | MILF Spend | MILF Spend/10k Pop | MILF Creators | MILF Creators/10k Moms | MILF Creators Per School | MILF Creator Income | MILFFed Tax (18%) | MILFState Tax | MILFTotal Tax | MILF TradeBalance |
| 1 | California | $10,518,000 | $2,667 | 15137 | 26 | 1.47 | $19,677,936 | $3,542,028 | $196,779 | $3,738,808 | +$9,159,936 |
| 2 | Texas | $7,452,000 | $2,382 | 11055 | 25 | 1.20 | $14,371,091 | $2,586,796 | $0 | $2,586,796 | +$6,919,091 |
| 3 | Florida | $4,788,000 | $2,050 | 10785 | 34 | 2.58 | $14,020,529 | $2,523,695 | $0 | $2,523,695 | +$9,232,529 |
| 4 | New York | $5,013,000 | $2,524 | 8143 | 27 | 1.69 | $10,586,574 | $1,905,583 | $423,463 | $2,329,046 | +$5,573,574 |
| 5 | Georgia | $2,622,000 | $2,347 | 5676 | 36 | 2.44 | $7,379,226 | $1,328,261 | $382,982 | $1,711,242 | +$4,757,226 |
| 6 | Nevada | $972,000 | $2,983 | 4809 | 105 | 6.54 | $6,252,006 | $1,125,361 | $0 | $1,125,361 | +$5,280,006 |
| 7 | Washington | $2,193,000 | $2,756 | 4222 | 37 | 1.66 | $5,488,904 | $988,003 | $0 | $988,003 | +$3,295,904 |
| 8 | Illinois | $3,552,000 | $2,795 | 3874 | 20 | 0.88 | $5,035,692 | $906,425 | $249,267 | $1,155,691 | +$1,483,692 |
| 9 | Ohio | $3,009,000 | $2,534 | 3462 | 20 | 0.98 | $4,501,134 | $810,204 | $123,781 | $933,985 | +$1,492,134 |
| 10 | Pennsylvania | $3,009,000 | $2,302 | 3345 | 17 | 1.14 | $4,348,126 | $782,663 | $133,488 | $916,150 | +$1,339,126 |
| 11 | Arizona | $2,112,000 | $2,788 | 3330 | 31 | 1.37 | $4,328,758 | $779,177 | $108,219 | $887,395 | +$2,216,758 |
| 12 | Michigan | $2,460,000 | $2,429 | 3255 | 22 | 0.94 | $4,231,918 | $761,745 | $179,857 | $941,602 | +$1,771,918 |
| 13 | Colorado | $1,698,000 | $2,853 | 2922 | 35 | 1.54 | $3,798,074 | $683,653 | $167,049 | $850,702 | +$2,100,074 |
| 14 | North Carolina | $2,376,000 | $2,151 | 2919 | 19 | 1.08 | $3,794,200 | $682,956 | $161,343 | $844,299 | +$1,418,200 |
| 15 | Tennessee | $1,089,000 | $1,508 | 2344 | 23 | 1.23 | $3,046,594 | $548,387 | $0 | $548,387 | +$1,957,594 |
| 16 | Oregon | $1,080,000 | $2,534 | 2217 | 35 | 1.72 | $2,881,965 | $518,754 | $127,801 | $646,555 | +$1,801,965 |
| 17 | Missouri | $1,389,000 | $2,225 | 1996 | 22 | 0.81 | $2,595,318 | $467,157 | $51,906 | $519,064 | +$1,206,318 |
| 18 | Indiana | $1,698,000 | $2,455 | 1722 | 17 | 0.90 | $2,238,946 | $403,010 | $67,168 | $470,179 | +$540,946 |
| 19 | Virginia | $1,941,000 | $2,206 | 1658 | 13 | 0.78 | $2,155,664 | $388,019 | $43,113 | $431,133 | +$214,664 |
| 21 | Minnesota | $1,437,000 | $2,481 | 1427 | 17 | 0.52 | $1,855,459 | $333,983 | $99,267 | $433,250 | +$418,459 |
| 20 | Massachusetts | $1,698,000 | $2,382 | 1427 | 14 | 0.78 | $1,855,459 | $333,983 | $92,773 | $426,756 | +$157,459 |
| 22 | Wisconsin | $1,368,000 | $2,299 | 1409 | 16 | 0.64 | $1,832,217 | $329,799 | $64,128 | $393,927 | +$464,217 |
| 23 | Louisiana | $792,000 | $1,726 | 1387 | 20 | 1.06 | $1,803,165 | $324,570 | $54,095 | $378,665 | +$1,011,165 |
| 24 | New Jersey | $2,049,000 | $2,157 | 1322 | 10 | 0.52 | $1,717,946 | $309,230 | $24,051 | $333,281 | -$331,054 |
| 25 | Oklahoma | $885,000 | $2,165 | 1213 | 21 | 0.68 | $1,576,559 | $283,781 | $3,941 | $287,722 | +$691,559 |
| 26 | Kentucky | $903,000 | $1,974 | 1198 | 18 | 0.77 | $1,557,191 | $280,294 | $62,288 | $342,582 | +$654,191 |
| 27 | Maryland | $1,296,000 | $2,074 | 1189 | 13 | 0.84 | $1,545,570 | $278,203 | $30,911 | $309,114 | +$249,570 |
| 28 | South Carolina | $1,080,000 | $1,976 | 1146 | 15 | 0.90 | $1,489,403 | $268,092 | $44,682 | $312,775 | +$409,403 |
| 29 | Alabama | $900,000 | $1,750 | 1064 | 15 | 0.69 | $1,382,879 | $248,918 | $27,658 | $276,576 | +$482,879 |
| 30 | District of Columbia | $273,000 | $3,890 | 991 | 95 | 4.04 | $1,287,975 | $231,836 | $51,519 | $283,355 | +$1,014,975 |
| 31 | Utah | $723,000 | $2,070 | 848 | 18 | 0.77 | $1,102,042 | $198,368 | $49,592 | $247,959 | +$379,042 |
| 32 | Iowa | $840,000 | $2,597 | 767 | 16 | 0.58 | $997,454 | $179,542 | $37,903 | $217,445 | +$157,454 |
| 33 | Hawaii | $366,000 | $2,543 | 745 | 35 | 2.52 | $968,402 | $174,312 | $13,558 | $187,870 | +$602,402 |
| 34 | Arkansas | $501,000 | $1,631 | 656 | 15 | 0.59 | $852,194 | $153,395 | $17,044 | $170,439 | +$351,194 |
| 35 | Kansas | $660,000 | $2,228 | 572 | 13 | 0.43 | $743,733 | $133,872 | $38,674 | $172,546 | +$83,733 |
| 36 | Connecticut | $819,000 | $2,231 | 498 | 9 | 0.49 | $646,893 | $116,441 | $12,938 | $129,379 | -$172,107 |
| 37 | Maine | $342,000 | $2,440 | 468 | 23 | 0.79 | $608,157 | $109,468 | $35,309 | $144,777 | +$266,157 |
| 38 | West Virginia | $390,000 | $2,208 | 428 | 21 | 0.63 | $555,863 | $100,055 | $12,340 | $112,396 | +$165,863 |
| 39 | Nebraska | $477,000 | $2,381 | 425 | 15 | 0.39 | $551,989 | $99,358 | $13,579 | $112,937 | +$74,989 |
| 40 | New Mexico | $591,000 | $2,784 | 399 | 13 | 0.45 | $519,064 | $93,431 | $7,786 | $101,217 | -$71,936 |
| 41 | Idaho | $381,000 | $1,916 | 372 | 13 | 0.47 | $484,201 | $87,156 | $25,663 | $112,819 | +$103,201 |
| 42 | Mississippi | $411,000 | $1,400 | 355 | 8 | 0.35 | $460,959 | $82,973 | $20,282 | $103,255 | +$49,959 |
| 43 | Alaska | $153,000 | $2,104 | 352 | 32 | 0.72 | $457,086 | $82,275 | $0 | $82,275 | +$304,086 |
| 44 | Montana | $225,000 | $1,983 | 291 | 18 | 0.35 | $377,677 | $67,982 | $17,751 | $85,733 | +$152,677 |
| 45 | New Hampshire | $375,000 | $2,672 | 277 | 14 | 0.55 | $360,246 | $64,844 | $0 | $64,844 | -$14,754 |
| 46 | Rhode Island | $228,000 | $2,056 | 203 | 12 | 0.65 | $263,405 | $47,413 | $9,878 | $57,291 | +$35,405 |
| 47 | North Dakota | $258,000 | $3,242 | 182 | 16 | 0.35 | $236,290 | $42,532 | $4,608 | $47,140 | -$21,710 |
| 48 | South Dakota | $207,000 | $2,270 | 171 | 13 | 0.24 | $222,733 | $40,092 | $0 | $40,092 | +$15,733 |
| 49 | Wyoming | $153,000 | $2,613 | 164 | 19 | 0.46 | $213,048 | $38,349 | $0 | $38,349 | +$60,048 |
| 50 | Vermont | $147,000 | $2,297 | 146 | 16 | 0.48 | $189,807 | $34,165 | $6,359 | $40,524 | +$42,807 |
| 51 | Delaware | $201,000 | $1,913 | 145 | 10 | 0.61 | $187,870 | $33,817 | $4,133 | $37,950 | -$13,130 |
ALL CITIES Data
Data for 160 U.S Cities showing how much each City spends on MILF creators, how much each Cities MILF creators earn, what they contribute to Uncle Sam & their resident State in taxes – and finally, the surplus or deficit of MILF trade for each City. The table is ranked by highest MILF creator income.
| 🔥 ONLYGUIDER MILFdex — 160 U.S. CITIES (2026) | |||||||||||
| Sorted by MILF Creator Income | Teal columns = Per-Capita Density Metrics | |||||||||||
| Rank | City | State | MILF Spend | MILF Spend/10k Pop | MILF Creators | MILF Creators/10k Moms | MILF Creator Income | MILFFed Tax (18%) | MILFState Tax | MILFTotal Tax | MILF TradeBalance |
| 1 | Los Angeles | California | $2,140,288 | $5,353 | 7701 | 130 | $10,011,343 | $1,802,042 | $100,113 | $1,902,155 | +$7,871,055 |
| 2 | New York City | New York | $2,617,200 | $2,973 | 6779 | 52 | $8,812,461 | $1,586,243 | $352,498 | $1,938,741 | +$6,195,261 |
| 3 | Las Vegas | Nevada | $526,348 | $7,758 | 4245 | 423 | $5,517,957 | $993,232 | $0 | $993,232 | +$4,991,609 |
| 4 | Miami | Florida | $526,348 | $11,248 | 3571 | 516 | $4,642,521 | $835,654 | $0 | $835,654 | +$4,116,173 |
| 5 | Atlanta | Georgia | $785,160 | $15,764 | 3476 | 472 | $4,518,565 | $813,342 | $234,514 | $1,047,855 | +$3,733,405 |
| 6 | Chicago | Illinois | $1,430,736 | $5,210 | 2738 | 67 | $3,559,847 | $640,772 | $176,212 | $816,985 | +$2,129,111 |
| 7 | Houston | Texas | $959,640 | $4,164 | 2737 | 80 | $3,557,910 | $640,424 | $0 | $640,424 | +$2,598,270 |
| 8 | Dallas | Texas | $785,160 | $6,039 | 2114 | 110 | $2,748,326 | $494,699 | $0 | $494,699 | +$1,963,166 |
| 9 | Seattle | Washington | $639,760 | $8,645 | 1648 | 150 | $2,142,106 | $385,579 | $0 | $385,579 | +$1,502,346 |
| 10 | Portland | Oregon | $351,868 | $5,393 | 1202 | 124 | $1,563,001 | $281,340 | $74,243 | $355,583 | +$1,211,133 |
| 11 | San Francisco | California | $351,868 | $3,980 | 1117 | 85 | $1,452,604 | $261,469 | $14,526 | $275,995 | +$1,100,736 |
| 12 | San Diego | California | $639,760 | $4,486 | 1022 | 48 | $1,328,648 | $239,157 | $13,286 | $252,443 | +$688,888 |
| 13 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | $526,348 | $3,282 | 1019 | 43 | $1,324,774 | $238,459 | $40,671 | $279,130 | +$798,426 |
| 14 | Washington | District of Columbia | $273,152 | $3,890 | 991 | 95 | $1,287,975 | $231,836 | $51,519 | $283,355 | +$1,014,823 |
| 15 | Denver | Colorado | $639,760 | $8,895 | 977 | 92 | $1,270,544 | $228,698 | $55,904 | $284,602 | +$630,784 |
| 16 | Austin | Texas | $526,348 | $5,377 | 954 | 66 | $1,239,555 | $223,120 | $0 | $223,120 | +$713,207 |
| 17 | Phoenix | Arizona | $684,335 | $4,122 | 883 | 36 | $1,148,525 | $206,735 | $28,713 | $235,448 | +$464,190 |
| 18 | Tampa | Florida | $260,057 | $6,755 | 852 | 150 | $1,107,852 | $199,413 | $0 | $199,413 | +$847,795 |
| 19 | Orlando | Florida | $430,384 | $13,993 | 808 | 177 | $1,049,748 | $188,955 | $0 | $188,955 | +$619,364 |
| 20 | Boston | Massachusetts | $430,384 | $6,371 | 760 | 76 | $987,770 | $177,799 | $49,389 | $227,187 | +$557,386 |
| 21 | Detroit | Michigan | $329,315 | $5,153 | 733 | 77 | $952,908 | $171,523 | $40,499 | $212,022 | +$623,593 |
| 22 | Nashville | Tennessee | $287,892 | $4,157 | 580 | 57 | $753,417 | $135,615 | $0 | $135,615 | +$465,525 |
| 23 | Charlotte | North Carolina | $351,868 | $4,023 | 532 | 41 | $691,439 | $124,459 | $29,386 | $153,845 | +$339,571 |
| 24 | New Orleans | Louisiana | $157,614 | $4,106 | 520 | 92 | $675,945 | $121,670 | $20,278 | $141,948 | +$518,331 |
| 25 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | $232,897 | $7,700 | 514 | 115 | $668,198 | $120,276 | $20,514 | $140,789 | +$435,301 |
| 26 | St. Louis | Missouri | $236,874 | $7,855 | 487 | 109 | $633,335 | $114,000 | $12,667 | $126,667 | +$396,461 |
| 27 | Kansas City | Kansas | $98,309 | $6,277 | 484 | 209 | $629,462 | $113,303 | $32,732 | $146,035 | +$531,152 |
| 28 | Kansas City | Missouri | $225,719 | $4,438 | 484 | 64 | $629,462 | $113,303 | $12,589 | $125,892 | +$403,743 |
| 29 | Baltimore | Maryland | $351,868 | $5,931 | 478 | 54 | $621,714 | $111,909 | $12,434 | $124,343 | +$269,846 |
| 30 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | $430,384 | $10,118 | 420 | 67 | $546,179 | $98,312 | $29,221 | $127,533 | +$115,795 |
| 31 | San Antonio | Texas | $521,618 | $3,371 | 401 | 18 | $521,000 | $93,780 | $0 | $93,780 | -$617 |
| 32 | Indianapolis | Indiana | $312,582 | $3,211 | 374 | 26 | $486,138 | $87,505 | $14,584 | $102,089 | +$173,555 |
| 33 | Cleveland | Ohio | $339,500 | $9,111 | 329 | 60 | $428,034 | $77,046 | $11,771 | $88,817 | +$88,534 |
| 34 | Memphis | Tennessee | $92,975 | $1,469 | 316 | 34 | $410,603 | $73,908 | $0 | $73,908 | +$317,628 |
| 35 | Jacksonville | Florida | $274,559 | $2,891 | 305 | 22 | $397,045 | $71,468 | $0 | $71,468 | +$122,486 |
| 36 | Columbus | Georgia | $39,624 | $1,978 | 299 | 101 | $389,298 | $70,074 | $20,205 | $90,278 | +$349,673 |
| 37 | Columbus | Ohio | $334,650 | $3,821 | 299 | 23 | $389,298 | $70,074 | $10,706 | $80,779 | +$54,648 |
| 38 | Cincinnati | Ohio | $238,329 | $7,704 | 295 | 64 | $383,487 | $69,028 | $10,546 | $79,574 | +$145,158 |
| 39 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | $219,899 | $3,697 | 271 | 31 | $352,498 | $63,450 | $12,337 | $75,787 | +$132,599 |
| 40 | Louisville | Kentucky | $199,044 | $3,143 | 261 | 28 | $338,941 | $61,009 | $13,558 | $74,567 | +$139,897 |
| 41 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | $219,220 | $3,219 | 241 | 24 | $313,762 | $56,477 | $784 | $57,262 | +$94,542 |
| 42 | Salt Lake City | Utah | $246,962 | $12,361 | 241 | 82 | $313,762 | $56,477 | $14,119 | $70,597 | +$66,800 |
| 43 | Buffalo | New York | $204,088 | $7,332 | 191 | 46 | $247,911 | $44,624 | $9,916 | $54,540 | +$43,823 |
| 44 | Honolulu | Hawaii | $159,323 | $4,550 | 179 | 34 | $232,417 | $41,835 | $3,254 | $45,089 | +$73,094 |
| 45 | Fort Worth | Texas | $307,247 | $3,344 | 176 | 13 | $228,543 | $41,138 | $0 | $41,138 | -$78,705 |
| 46 | Richmond | Virginia | $108,882 | $4,805 | 167 | 50 | $216,922 | $39,046 | $4,338 | $43,384 | +$108,040 |
| 47 | Raleigh | North Carolina | $225,719 | $4,436 | 153 | 20 | $199,491 | $35,908 | $8,478 | $44,387 | -$26,228 |
| 48 | San Jose | California | $351,868 | $3,416 | 142 | 9 | $183,996 | $33,119 | $1,840 | $34,959 | -$167,872 |
| 49 | Scottsdale | Arizona | $117,758 | $4,612 | 131 | 35 | $170,439 | $30,679 | $4,261 | $34,940 | +$52,681 |
| 50 | Charleston | South Carolina | $79,637 | $5,790 | 130 | 64 | $168,502 | $30,330 | $5,055 | $35,385 | +$88,865 |
| 51 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | $85,020 | $1,814 | 130 | 19 | $168,502 | $30,330 | $421 | $30,752 | +$83,482 |
| 52 | Reno | Nevada | $74,108 | $2,906 | 128 | 34 | $166,565 | $29,982 | $0 | $29,982 | +$92,457 |
| 53 | Savannah | Georgia | $75,466 | $5,123 | 122 | 56 | $158,818 | $28,587 | $8,243 | $36,830 | +$83,352 |
| 54 | Knoxville | Tennessee | $73,235 | $3,966 | 119 | 44 | $154,944 | $27,890 | $0 | $27,890 | +$81,709 |
| 55 | Tucson | Arizona | $176,928 | $3,241 | 116 | 14 | $151,071 | $27,193 | $3,777 | $30,970 | -$25,857 |
| 56 | Omaha | Nebraska | $185,270 | $3,833 | 113 | 16 | $147,197 | $26,495 | $3,621 | $30,117 | -$38,073 |
| 57 | Albuquerque | New Mexico | $223,585 | $3,989 | 110 | 13 | $143,324 | $25,798 | $2,150 | $27,948 | -$80,261 |
| 58 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | $151,514 | $3,132 | 109 | 15 | $141,387 | $25,450 | $6,221 | $31,671 | -$10,127 |
| 59 | Rochester | New York | $98,406 | $4,673 | 109 | 35 | $141,387 | $25,450 | $5,655 | $31,105 | +$42,980 |
| 60 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | $166,743 | $3,673 | 103 | 15 | $133,640 | $24,055 | $2,673 | $26,728 | -$33,103 |
| 61 | Birmingham | Alabama | $144,918 | $7,335 | 101 | 35 | $131,703 | $23,706 | $2,634 | $26,341 | -$13,215 |
| 62 | Fresno | California | $134,345 | $2,534 | 97 | 12 | $125,892 | $22,661 | $1,259 | $23,920 | -$8,453 |
| 63 | Spokane | Washington | $69,258 | $3,025 | 85 | 25 | $110,398 | $19,872 | $0 | $19,872 | +$41,140 |
| 64 | Norfolk | Virginia | $64,068 | $2,692 | 83 | 24 | $108,461 | $19,523 | $2,169 | $21,692 | +$44,393 |
| 65 | Greensboro | North Carolina | $58,055 | $1,941 | 78 | 18 | $100,714 | $18,128 | $4,280 | $22,409 | +$42,659 |
| 66 | Tacoma | Washington | $101,607 | $4,632 | 76 | 23 | $98,777 | $17,780 | $0 | $17,780 | -$2,830 |
| 67 | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | $58,055 | $2,635 | 72 | 22 | $92,967 | $16,734 | $2,789 | $19,523 | +$34,912 |
| 68 | Chattanooga | Tennessee | $40,449 | $2,234 | 70 | 26 | $91,030 | $16,385 | $0 | $16,385 | +$50,581 |
| 69 | Wichita | Kansas | $95,108 | $2,390 | 69 | 12 | $89,093 | $16,037 | $4,633 | $20,670 | -$6,015 |
| 70 | Columbia | South Carolina | $52,428 | $3,901 | 66 | 33 | $85,219 | $15,339 | $2,557 | $17,896 | +$32,791 |
| 71 | Toledo | Ohio | $65,523 | $2,419 | 63 | 16 | $81,346 | $14,642 | $2,237 | $16,879 | +$15,822 |
| 72 | Lexington | Kentucky | $83,323 | $2,583 | 61 | 13 | $79,409 | $14,294 | $3,176 | $17,470 | -$3,914 |
| 73 | St. Petersburg | Florida | $55,241 | $2,139 | 61 | 16 | $79,409 | $14,294 | $0 | $14,294 | +$24,168 |
| 74 | Akron | Ohio | $58,248 | $3,051 | 58 | 21 | $75,535 | $13,596 | $2,077 | $15,674 | +$17,287 |
| 75 | Jersey City | New Jersey | $80,898 | $2,970 | 58 | 14 | $75,535 | $13,596 | $1,057 | $14,654 | -$5,363 |
| 76 | Grand Rapids | Michigan | $108,107 | $5,435 | 57 | 19 | $73,599 | $13,248 | $3,128 | $16,376 | -$34,508 |
| 77 | Des Moines | Iowa | $72,992 | $2,945 | 55 | 15 | $71,662 | $12,899 | $2,723 | $15,622 | -$1,331 |
| 78 | Anchorage | Alaska | $63,195 | $2,168 | 54 | 12 | $69,725 | $12,550 | $0 | $12,550 | +$6,529 |
| 79 | Boise | Idaho | $68,433 | $2,904 | 54 | 15 | $69,725 | $12,550 | $3,695 | $16,246 | +$1,291 |
| 80 | Augusta | Georgia | $43,214 | $2,148 | 52 | 18 | $67,788 | $12,202 | $3,518 | $15,720 | +$24,575 |
| 81 | Madison | Wisconsin | $62,516 | $2,317 | 52 | 13 | $67,788 | $12,202 | $2,373 | $14,574 | +$5,272 |
| 82 | Newark | New Jersey | $81,868 | $2,886 | 52 | 12 | $67,788 | $12,202 | $949 | $13,151 | -$14,080 |
| 83 | Springfield | Missouri | $65,523 | $3,857 | 52 | 21 | $67,788 | $12,202 | $1,356 | $13,558 | +$2,265 |
| 84 | Huntsville | Alabama | $37,539 | $1,746 | 51 | 16 | $65,851 | $11,853 | $1,317 | $13,170 | +$28,312 |
| 85 | Little Rock | Arkansas | $58,976 | $2,911 | 51 | 17 | $65,851 | $11,853 | $1,317 | $13,170 | +$6,875 |
| 86 | Syracuse | New York | $69,840 | $4,811 | 49 | 23 | $63,915 | $11,505 | $2,557 | $14,061 | -$5,925 |
| 87 | Providence | Rhode Island | $61,643 | $3,239 | 46 | 16 | $60,041 | $10,807 | $2,252 | $13,059 | -$1,603 |
| 88 | Fort Wayne | Indiana | $85,554 | $3,242 | 43 | 11 | $56,167 | $10,110 | $1,685 | $11,795 | -$29,387 |
| 89 | Salem | Oregon | $58,442 | $3,329 | 43 | 17 | $56,167 | $10,110 | $2,668 | $12,778 | -$2,275 |
| 90 | Mesa | Arizona | $135,121 | $2,655 | 42 | 6 | $54,231 | $9,761 | $1,356 | $11,117 | -$80,890 |
| 91 | Hartford | Connecticut | $57,569 | $4,756 | 39 | 22 | $50,357 | $9,064 | $1,007 | $10,071 | -$7,213 |
| 92 | Mobile | Alabama | $74,302 | $3,972 | 39 | 14 | $50,357 | $9,064 | $1,007 | $10,071 | -$23,945 |
| 93 | Clarksville | Tennessee | $28,955 | $1,784 | 33 | 14 | $42,610 | $7,670 | $0 | $7,670 | +$13,655 |
| 94 | Evansville | Indiana | $37,151 | $3,137 | 33 | 19 | $42,610 | $7,670 | $1,278 | $8,948 | +$5,459 |
| 95 | Lafayette | Louisiana | $47,772 | $3,146 | 33 | 15 | $42,610 | $7,670 | $1,278 | $8,948 | -$5,163 |
| 96 | Lansing | Michigan | $33,513 | $2,932 | 33 | 19 | $42,610 | $7,670 | $1,811 | $9,481 | +$9,096 |
| 97 | Montgomery | Alabama | $32,058 | $1,598 | 31 | 11 | $40,673 | $7,321 | $813 | $8,135 | +$8,614 |
| 98 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | $48,306 | $1,935 | 31 | 8 | $40,673 | $7,321 | $1,729 | $9,050 | -$7,633 |
| 99 | Eugene | Oregon | $43,068 | $2,273 | 30 | 11 | $38,736 | $6,972 | $1,840 | $8,812 | -$4,332 |
| 100 | Jackson | Mississippi | $41,273 | $2,796 | 30 | 14 | $38,736 | $6,972 | $1,704 | $8,677 | -$2,537 |
| 101 | Paradise | Nevada | $19,206 | $794 | 30 | 8 | $38,736 | $6,972 | $0 | $6,972 | +$19,530 |
| 102 | Worcester | Massachusetts | $41,759 | $2,257 | 30 | 11 | $38,736 | $6,972 | $1,937 | $8,909 | -$3,022 |
| 103 | Vancouver | Washington | $57,909 | $3,084 | 28 | 10 | $36,799 | $6,624 | $0 | $6,624 | -$21,110 |
| 104 | Aurora | Illinois | $45,396 | $2,172 | 27 | 9 | $34,862 | $6,275 | $1,726 | $8,001 | -$10,534 |
| 105 | Aurora | Colorado | $104,129 | $2,783 | 27 | 5 | $34,862 | $6,275 | $1,534 | $7,809 | -$69,267 |
| 106 | Fargo | North Dakota | $58,442 | $4,645 | 27 | 14 | $34,862 | $6,275 | $680 | $6,955 | -$23,580 |
| 107 | Shreveport | Louisiana | $30,458 | $1,622 | 27 | 10 | $34,862 | $6,275 | $1,046 | $7,321 | +$4,405 |
| 108 | Sioux Falls | South Dakota | $46,608 | $2,337 | 27 | 9 | $34,862 | $6,275 | $0 | $6,275 | -$11,746 |
| 109 | Columbia | Missouri | $32,204 | $2,616 | 25 | 14 | $32,926 | $5,927 | $659 | $6,585 | +$722 |
| 110 | Allentown | Pennsylvania | $30,070 | $2,404 | 24 | 13 | $30,989 | $5,578 | $951 | $6,529 | +$919 |
| 111 | Durham | North Carolina | $56,211 | $1,983 | 24 | 6 | $30,989 | $5,578 | $1,317 | $6,895 | -$25,223 |
| 112 | Fayetteville | Arkansas | $27,596 | $2,937 | 24 | 17 | $30,989 | $5,578 | $620 | $6,198 | +$3,392 |
| 113 | Green Bay | Wisconsin | $42,341 | $4,069 | 24 | 15 | $30,989 | $5,578 | $1,085 | $6,663 | -$11,352 |
| 114 | Fort Collins | Colorado | $45,978 | $2,740 | 22 | 9 | $29,052 | $5,229 | $1,278 | $6,508 | -$16,926 |
| 115 | Erie | Pennsylvania | $41,031 | $4,213 | 21 | 15 | $27,115 | $4,881 | $832 | $5,713 | -$13,916 |
| 116 | Henderson | Nevada | $78,812 | $2,462 | 21 | 4 | $27,115 | $4,881 | $0 | $4,881 | -$51,697 |
| 117 | Cedar Rapids | Iowa | $35,162 | $2,577 | 19 | 10 | $25,178 | $4,532 | $957 | $5,489 | -$9,984 |
| 118 | Chesapeake | Virginia | $63,389 | $2,610 | 19 | 5 | $25,178 | $4,532 | $504 | $5,036 | -$38,211 |
| 119 | South Bend | Indiana | $26,481 | $2,570 | 18 | 12 | $23,242 | $4,183 | $697 | $4,881 | -$3,239 |
| 120 | Rockford | Illinois | $41,322 | $2,948 | 16 | 8 | $21,305 | $3,835 | $1,055 | $4,889 | -$20,017 |
| 121 | Springfield | Massachusetts | $35,453 | $2,316 | 16 | 7 | $21,305 | $3,835 | $1,065 | $4,900 | -$14,149 |
| 122 | Bellevue | Washington | $37,442 | $2,570 | 13 | 6 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $0 | $3,138 | -$20,011 |
| 123 | Manchester | New Hampshire | $53,592 | $4,659 | 13 | 8 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $0 | $3,138 | -$36,161 |
| 124 | New Haven | Connecticut | $46,269 | $3,452 | 13 | 7 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $349 | $3,486 | -$28,838 |
| 125 | Newport News | Virginia | $40,886 | $2,272 | 13 | 5 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $349 | $3,486 | -$23,454 |
| 126 | Saint Paul | Minnesota | $195,891 | $6,288 | 13 | 3 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $933 | $4,070 | -$178,460 |
| 127 | Topeka | Kansas | $27,984 | $2,181 | 13 | 7 | $17,431 | $3,138 | $906 | $4,044 | -$10,553 |
| 128 | Chandler | Arizona | $61,886 | $2,406 | 12 | 3 | $15,494 | $2,789 | $387 | $3,176 | -$46,392 |
| 129 | North Las Vegas | Nevada | $56,066 | $2,315 | 12 | 3 | $15,494 | $2,789 | $0 | $2,789 | -$40,572 |
| 130 | Joliet | Illinois | $44,523 | $3,020 | 10 | 5 | $13,558 | $2,440 | $671 | $3,111 | -$30,965 |
| 131 | Norman | Oklahoma | $27,257 | $2,228 | 10 | 6 | $13,558 | $2,440 | $34 | $2,474 | -$13,699 |
| 132 | Rochester | Minnesota | $23,619 | $2,132 | 10 | 6 | $13,558 | $2,440 | $725 | $3,166 | -$10,062 |
| 133 | Independence | Missouri | $28,324 | $2,442 | 9 | 5 | $11,621 | $2,092 | $232 | $2,324 | -$16,703 |
| 134 | Las Cruces | New Mexico | $39,964 | $3,556 | 9 | 5 | $11,621 | $2,092 | $174 | $2,266 | -$28,343 |
| 135 | Tuscaloosa | Alabama | $17,897 | $1,797 | 9 | 6 | $11,621 | $2,092 | $232 | $2,324 | -$6,276 |
| 136 | Paterson | New Jersey | $31,476 | $1,971 | 7 | 3 | $9,684 | $1,743 | $136 | $1,879 | -$21,792 |
| 137 | Stamford | Connecticut | $25,268 | $1,865 | 7 | 4 | $9,684 | $1,743 | $194 | $1,937 | -$15,584 |
| 138 | Billings | Montana | $30,846 | $2,634 | 6 | 3 | $7,747 | $1,394 | $364 | $1,759 | -$23,099 |
| 139 | Lawton | Oklahoma | $24,347 | $2,687 | 6 | 4 | $7,747 | $1,394 | $19 | $1,414 | -$16,600 |
| 140 | Waterbury | Connecticut | $35,793 | $3,129 | 6 | 4 | $7,747 | $1,394 | $155 | $1,549 | -$28,046 |
| 141 | Lakewood | Colorado | $59,655 | $3,805 | 5 | 2 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $256 | $1,302 | -$53,845 |
| 142 | Nampa | Idaho | $32,883 | $3,085 | 5 | 3 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $308 | $1,354 | -$27,073 |
| 143 | Naperville | Illinois | $27,451 | $1,827 | 5 | 2 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $288 | $1,333 | -$21,641 |
| 144 | Olathe | Kansas | $17,751 | $966 | 5 | 2 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $302 | $1,348 | -$11,941 |
| 145 | Overland Park | Kansas | $57,278 | $2,995 | 5 | 2 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $302 | $1,348 | -$51,468 |
| 146 | Rio Rancho | New Mexico | $34,435 | $3,791 | 5 | 3 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $87 | $1,133 | -$28,625 |
| 147 | Warren | Michigan | $39,236 | $2,927 | 5 | 2 | $5,810 | $1,046 | $247 | $1,293 | -$33,426 |
| 148 | Broken Arrow | Oklahoma | $23,862 | $2,111 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $10 | $707 | -$19,988 |
| 149 | Cambridge | Massachusetts | $45,396 | $3,834 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $194 | $891 | -$41,522 |
| 150 | Carmel | Indiana | $34,920 | $3,499 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $116 | $813 | -$31,046 |
| 151 | Columbia | Maryland | $14,792 | $1,420 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $77 | $775 | -$10,919 |
| 152 | Kenosha | Wisconsin | $33,611 | $3,387 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $136 | $833 | -$29,737 |
| 153 | Lowell | Massachusetts | $22,698 | $2,038 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $194 | $891 | -$18,824 |
| 154 | Meridian | Idaho | $20,321 | $1,767 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $205 | $903 | -$16,448 |
| 155 | North Charleston | South Carolina | $23,862 | $2,273 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $116 | $813 | -$19,988 |
| 156 | Provo | Utah | $15,132 | $1,315 | 3 | 2 | $3,874 | $697 | $174 | $872 | -$11,258 |
| 157 | Bridgeport | Connecticut | $34,484 | $2,320 | 2 | 1 | $1,937 | $349 | $39 | $387 | -$32,547 |
| 158 | Edison | New Jersey | $16,975 | $1,572 | 2 | 1 | $1,937 | $349 | $27 | $376 | -$15,038 |
| 159 | Sandy | Utah | $10,718 | $989 | 2 | 1 | $1,937 | $349 | $87 | $436 | -$8,782 |
| 160 | Sterling Heights | Michigan | $25,026 | $1,907 | 2 | 1 | $1,937 | $349 | $82 | $431 | -$23,089 |
Sources & Citations
1. The Conversation — The MILF: a brief cultural history from Mrs Robinson to Stifler’s Mom
2. Men’s Health — MILF Porn: Why Do So Many Men Watch It? (citing Lehmiller, Tell Me What You Want)
3. MedCrave Journal of Psychology — ‘Hot Moms’: Sexual Objectification and Motherhood (D. Nunez, 2016)
4. Vice — MILF Madness: Why So Many Men Want to Fuck Moms
5. SWR Data / Substack — How Much Money Do Creators Actually Make? (creator income survey)
6. KCRA News — One year later, Sacramento OnlyFans mom has no regrets (Crystal Jackson)
7. The Express — I’m a mom who makes $50K a month sexting on the school run (Holly Jane)
8. Daily Mail — OnlyFans’ Lucy Banks: I know I’m the favourite mum at the school gates
9. NY Post — Florida mom booted from school pickup area for promoting OnlyFans on her car
Data & Methodology
All data sourced from OnlyGuider’s 2025 U.S. OnlyFans reporting, including the OnlyFans Wrapped 2025 report, the 2026 U.S. OnlyFans Creator Census, and America’s OnlyFans Balance of Trade 2026. MILF figures derived by applying 8.93% creator share and 3% spend share to published state and city totals. Per-capita density metrics calculated by applying same rates to published per-10k/per-100k figures. Per 10k Moms figure calculated by applying a 14.8% calculation to location population to represent the nationally representative share of females aged 30 to 59 years old. Tax calculations use 18% federal effective rate plus published state income tax rates. Registered creator accounts include inactive and dormant accounts; methodology is intentionally conservative and consistent with OnlyGuider’s wider U.S. reporting.
Share